IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v8y2020i2p356-361_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Marx, Paul
  • Picot, Georg

Abstract

This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the consistency between theory and measurement. Finally, we recommend three measures that political scientists should deploy when analyzing the effect of labor market vulnerability on political preferences. We point out what each of these variables captures and what methodological challenges should be taken into account when using them.

Suggested Citation

  • Marx, Paul & Picot, Georg, 2020. "Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 356-361, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:356-361_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847018000298/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorenza Antonucci & Carlo D’Ippoliti & Laszlo Horvath & André Krouwel, 2023. "What’s Work Got to Do with It? How Precarity Influences Radical Party Support in France and the Netherlands," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 28(1), pages 110-131, March.
    2. Pahontu, Raluca L., 2022. "Divisive jobs: three facets of risk, precarity, and redistribution," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111593, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Hyojin Seo, 2021. "‘Dual’ labour market? Patterns of segmentation in European labour markets and the varieties of precariousness," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(4), pages 485-503, November.
    4. Marcello Natili & Fedra Negri, 2023. "Disentangling (new) labour market divides: outsiders’ and globalization losers’ socio-economic risks in Europe," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1561-1585, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:356-361_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.