IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v56y2021i5p1505-1536_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Analysts: Method for Defining Peer Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Kaustia, Markku
  • Rantala, Ville

Abstract

We develop a method for defining groups of peer firms on the basis of joint analyst coverage. Besides industry boundaries, analysts’ coverage choices reflect other aspects of firm relatedness such as business model. We find that the analyst-based method produces substantially more homogeneous groups of firms compared to common industry classifications, and has a number of other desirable properties. The paper has two broader implications. First, it demonstrates the advantages of a self-organizing approach to classification, as opposed to a hierarchical system. Second, it illustrates a new positive information production externality generated by the institution of security market analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaustia, Markku & Rantala, Ville, 2021. "Common Analysts: Method for Defining Peer Firms," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(5), pages 1505-1536, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:5:p:1505-1536_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109020000514/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi, Biao & Xiang, Xueman, 2023. "Pair analyst coverage and return comovement: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Shen, Xieyang & Yang, Sijie & Chen, Yulin & Zeng, Jianyu, 2022. "How does economic policy uncertainty influence managers' learning from peers' stock prices? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Yi, Biao & Guo, Shuxin, 2022. "Common analyst links and predictable returns: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Fu, Zheng & Ma, Yechi & Li, Suyang & Qiao, Lu, 2023. "Peer performance and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings recognition," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Jiafeng Gu, 2024. "Peer influence, market power, and enterprises' green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 108-121, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:5:p:1505-1536_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.