IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v49y1989i02p435-447_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation and Rivalry in the International Steel Cartel, 1926–1933

Author

Listed:
  • Barbezat, Daniel

Abstract

The International Steel Cartel of 1926 was a necessary step toward a coordinated system of cartels to govern steel exports. Like the present industrial policies of the European Community, however, differences in the aims of the domestic industries caused rivalry among the members of the 1926 agreement. Although thecartel was not able to fix its members' production shares, it was able to limit tradebetween them, which allowed for the formation and operation of their domesticcartels.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbezat, Daniel, 1989. "Cooperation and Rivalry in the International Steel Cartel, 1926–1933," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 435-447, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:49:y:1989:i:02:p:435-447_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050700008044/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Bromhead, Alan & Fernihough, Alan & Lampe, Markus & O'Rourke, Kevin H., 2017. "When Britain turned inward: Protection and the shift towards Empire in interwar Britain," QUCEH Working Paper Series 2017-02, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History.
    2. Yannis Karagiannis, 2016. "The Origins of the Common Market: Political Economy vs. Hagiography," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 233-248, March.
    3. Dye, Alan & Sicotte, Richard, 2006. "How brinkmanship saved Chadbourne: Credibility and the International Sugar Agreement of 1931," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 223-256, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:49:y:1989:i:02:p:435-447_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.