IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v22y1990i01p33-40_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Safety: The Consumer Side of the Environmental Issue

Author

Listed:
  • Kramer, Carol S.

Abstract

A key player in the current policy debate over chemical use in food production is the consumer. In the last few years we have witnessed that consumer activism has been able to force policy change in a number of areas important to the agricultural and food industries. Consumers' perceptions and concerns about pesticide and animal drug residues in foods can translate, in sometimes volatile and unpredictable ways, into market behavior. In addition to affecting the consumer's own satisfaction and welfare, the consumer's market behavior is obviously of major interest to agricultural producers, manufacturers, wholesalers, and food retailers. Policymakers and regulators are feeling heightened pressure to understand and respond better to consumer (and voter) concerns over pesticides and other chemicals commonly used in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Kramer, Carol S., 1990. "Food Safety: The Consumer Side of the Environmental Issue," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 33-40, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:22:y:1990:i:01:p:33-40_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200001448/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taylor, Donald C., 1992. "Underlying Values and Beliefs "Modern Science" Versus "Sustainable Development"," Economics Staff Papers 232225, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Renee B. Kim, 2012. "Consumers' perceptions of food risk management quality: Chinese and Korean evaluations," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 10-20.
    3. Wier, Mette & Hansen, Lars Gaarn & Andersen, Laura Mørch, 2003. "Consumer preferences for organic foods," MPRA Paper 60539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Antonovitz, Frances & Liu, Donald J., 1996. "A HEDONIC PRICE STUDY OF PESTICIDES IN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; Proceedings of the Fifth Joint Conference on Agriculture, Food, and the Environment, June 17-18, 1996, Padova, Italy," Working Papers 14389, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    5. Arahata, Katsumi, 2009. "Can politicians calm public fears of food-borne risks or do they adopt excessively stringent preventive measures?: A political economy approach," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51621, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Katrin, Millock & Hansen, Lars Gårn, 2002. "Willingness to Pay for Organic Foods: A Comparison between Survey Data and Panel Data from Denmark," MPRA Paper 47588, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Byrne, Patrick J. & Gempesaw, Conrado M., II & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C., 1991. "An Evaluation Of Consumer Pesticide Residue Concerns And Risk Information Sources," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Fuglie, Keith & Ballenger, Nicole & Rubenstein, Kelly Day & Klotz, Cassandra & Ollinger, Michael & Reilly, John & Vasavada, Utpal & Yee, Jet, 1996. "Agricultural Research and Development: Public and Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and Institutions," Agricultural Economic Reports 262031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Eom, Young Sook, 1993. "Pesticide Residue Risks, Produce Choice, and Valuation of Food Safety: A Random Utility Approach," Working Papers 116113, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    10. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Research Needs in the Valuation of Food Safety and Nutrition," Staff Paper Series 201172, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    11. Arahata, Katsumi, 2006. "Who Are More Sensitive to Food-Borne Risks in Japan, Consumers or Politicians?: A Political Economy Perspective," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21256, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Kramer, Carol S., 0. "Managing Food Safety Risks In The Food System: Policy Options And Opportunities For Extension," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:22:y:1990:i:01:p:33-40_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.