This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Bias Reduction And Likelihood-Based Almost Exactly Sized Hypothesis Testing In Predictive Regressions Using The Restricted Likelihood

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Chen, Willa W.
Deo, Rohit S.
Abstract

Difficulties with inference in predictive regressions are generally attributed to strong persistence in the predictor series. We show that the major source of the problem is actually the nuisance intercept parameter, and we propose basing inference on the restricted likelihood, which is free of such nuisance location parameters and also possesses small curvature, making it suitable for inference. The bias of the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates is shown to be approximately 50% less than that of the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates near the unit root, without loss of efficiency. The error in the chi-square approximation to the distribution of the REML-based likelihood ratio test (RLRT) for no predictability is shown to be where | ) is the cumulative distribution function (c.d.f.) of a random variable. This very small error, free of the autoregressive (AR) parameter, suggests that the RLRT for predictability has very good size properties even when the regressor has strong persistence. The Bartlett-corrected RLRT achieves an O(n 714) test with gains that can be substantial. The Campbell and Yogo (2006, Journal of Financial Econometrics 81, 27 60) Bonferroni Q test is found to have size distortions and can be significantly oversized.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0266466608090464
File Format: text/html
File Function: link to article abstract page
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Cambridge University Press in its journal Econometric Theory.

Volume (Year): 25 (2009)
Issue (Month): 05 (October)
Pages: 1143-1179
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:25:y:2009:i:05:p:1143-1179_09

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Fax: +44 (0)1223 325150
Email:
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_ECT

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Mike Eden).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can create a compilation of all publications of a group of people, say alumni of a program, your students or memers of an association.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.