This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Decision Externalities, Economic Efficiency and Institutional Response

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Walter Hettich
Stanley L. Winer

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The paper examines the application of the concept of economic efficiency to collective decision processes and public sector institutions. We show that the existence of transactions costs and of collective decision-making procedures requires a broader framework for judging policy processes and institutions than has traditionally been adopted. Next we develop the concept of institutional response and argue that many public decision structures and institutions may already embody counterbalancing features designed to deal with potential efficiency problems. We then propose a diagnostic procedure for finding potential efficiency problems by looking for situations where the major decision-makers do not bear all the costs of their actions or capture all the benefits that these actions create. The paper identifies examples of such decision externalities in three areas of public members of the bureaucracy. The discussion is given specific empirical content by relating it to recent major institutional or policy initiatives taken in Canada.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://economics.ca/cgi/jab?journal=cpp&view=v21n3/CPPv21n3p344.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: No access restriction except for the four most recent issues.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Toronto Press in its journal Canadian Public Policy.

Volume (Year): 21 (1995)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Pages: 344-361
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:21:y:1995:i:3:p:344-361

Contact details of provider:
Postal: University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8
Email:
Web page: http://economics.ca/cpp/

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.utpjournals.com/cpp/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Prof. Werner Antweiler).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Marsiliani, Laura & Renström, Thomas I, 2007. "Political Institutions and Economic Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 6143, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Kenneth Mackenzie, 1999. "Diseño institucional y política pública: una perspectiva microeconómica," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 1(1), pages 17-58, July-dece. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc data is maintained by each archive holder on its own website. Nothing is held centrally.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.