IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v10y2022i2p66-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Intersectional Analysis of Child and Adolescent Inclusion in Local Participation Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Noemi Laforgue

    (Faculty of Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Spain)

  • Marta Sabariego

    (Faculty of Education, University of Barcelona, Spain)

  • Antonio Ruiz

    (Faculty of Education, University of Barcelona, Spain)

  • Ana Belén Cano-Hila

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Educational and social initiatives promoting participation among children and adolescents struggle with the widely‐held notion that non‐adult stages of life are merely transitory and that, therefore, non‐adults’ views on public life are of less value. Apart from this hurdle of adult‐centrism, there are other obstacles to the full participation of this segment of the population. The present study analyses the inbuilt structures that help or hinder children and adolescents’ participation in the local arena. Being ascribed to one or other of the social categories (gender, origins, racialisation, economic status, functional diversity, physical and mental health, gender identity), in addition to being a child or adolescent, involves a further difficulty in exercising one’s rights in general and the right of participation in particular, and this weakens young people’s social inclusion and exercise of citizenship, deepening their social vulnerability. This is where the intersectional approach can help us avoid the exclusion of children and adolescents with added social barriers. In this article, we survey 191 local youth workers to determine their perceptions of inclusivity in child participation bodies in their municipality. The specific measures in place are also discussed. Lastly, we identify the challenges to children’s inclusion in local participation processes and some strategies for advancing towards the creation of more diverse and inclusive arenas of participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Noemi Laforgue & Marta Sabariego & Antonio Ruiz & Ana Belén Cano-Hila, 2022. "An Intersectional Analysis of Child and Adolescent Inclusion in Local Participation Processes," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 66-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:66-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5094
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherry R. Arnstein, 2019. "A Ladder of Citizen Participation," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(1), pages 24-34, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Seneca Terkelsen & Christian Tolstrup Wester & Gabriel Gulis & Jørgen Jespersen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen, 2022. "Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Mketo, Ally Rajab & Ringo, Cliford J. & Nuhu, Said & Mpambije, Chakupewa Joseph, 2022. "Enhancing community participation for environmental health improvement in rural Tanzania: Evidence from Bukombe district," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Elias Mseti & Eliza Mwakasangula, 2019. "Planning for Education Development Projects: Experiences from the Application of O&OD Approach in Kiroka Ward, Morogoro Rural District," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 191-207, December.
    4. Jurjonas, Matthew & Seekamp, Erin & Rivers, Louie & Cutts, Bethany, 2020. "Uncovering climate (in)justice with an adaptive capacity assessment: A multiple case study in rural coastal North Carolina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Anna Gabor & Florian Reinwald & Doris Damyanovic, 2023. "Methodological Framework for Fostering the Implementation of Climate-Responsive Public Spaces and Streetscapes to Support Multifunctional Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Indranil De & Rooba Hasan & Mubashshir Iqbal, 2022. "Natural Treatment Systems and Importance of Social Cost Benefit Analysis in Developing Countries: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Benedikt Lenzer & Christina Hoffmann & Peter Hoffmann & Ursula Müller-Werdan & Manuel Rupprecht & Christian Witt & Cornelius Herzig & Uta Liebers, 2021. "A Qualitative Study on Concerns, Needs, and Expectations of Hospital Patients Related to Climate Change: Arguments for a Patient-Centered Adaptation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Cristian Campagnaro & Nicolò Di Prima & Sara Ceraolo, 2021. "Co‐Design and the Collective Creativity Processes in Care Systems and Places," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 130-142.
    9. Matamanda, Abraham R. & Chinozvina, Queen L., 2020. "Driving Forces of Citizen Participation in Urban Development Practice in Harare, Zimbabwe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Sigfrid Kjeldaas & Tim Dassler & Trine Antonsen & Odd-Gunnar Wikmark & Anne I. Myhr, 2023. "With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 533-545, June.
    11. Wang, Yongcheng & Yamaguchi, Keita & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2020. "The multivalent nexus of redevelopment and heritage conservation: A mixed-methods study of the site-level public consultation of urban development in Macao," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Veldhuizen, Caroline & Desouza, Kevin C. & Bandara, Wasana & Chang, Artemis, 2022. "How much is not enough: Corporate social responsibility and beyond in the resources sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Susan de Koning & Nathalie Steins & Luc van Hoof, 2021. "Balancing Sustainability Transitions through State-Led Participatory Processes: The Case of the Dutch North Sea Agreement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Bieke Zaman, 2020. "Designing Technologies with and for Youth: Traps of Privacy by Design," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 229-238.
    15. Nurul Athirah Naserrudin & Richard Culleton & Pauline Yong Pau Lin & Sara Elizabeth Baumann & Rozita Hod & Mohammad Saffree Jeffree & Kamruddin Ahmed & Mohd Rohaizat Hassan, 2022. "Generating Trust in Participatory Research on Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria: A Study with Rural Community Gatekeepers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:66-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.