IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v10y2022i1p235-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance of Fragmented Compliance and Voluntary Carbon Markets Under the Paris Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna-Mari Ahonen

    (Perspectives Climate Research, Germany)

  • Juliana Kessler

    (Perspectives Climate Research, Germany)

  • Axel Michaelowa

    (Perspectives Climate Research, Germany / Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Aglaja Espelage

    (Perspectives Climate Research, Germany)

  • Stephan Hoch

    (Perspectives Climate Research, Germany)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the emergence of multiple carbon market segments has led to fragmentation of governance of international carbon markets. International baseline-and-credit systems for greenhouse gas mitigation have been repeatedly expected to wither away, but show significant resilience. Still, Parties to the Paris Agreement have struggled to finalize rules for market-based cooperation under Article 6, which are still being negotiated. Generally, there is tension between international top-down and bottom-up governance. The former was pioneered through the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol and is likely to be utilized for the Article 6.4 mechanism, while the latter was used for the first track of Joint Implementation and will be applied for Article 6.2. Voluntary carbon markets governed bottom-up and outside the Kyoto Protocol by private institutions have recently gained importance by offering complementary project types and methodological approaches. The clear intention of some Parties to use market-based cooperation in order to reach their nationally determined contributions to the Paris Agreement have led to an ongoing process of navigating the alignment of these fragmented carbon market instruments with the implementation of nationally determined contributions and Paris Agreement’s governance architecture. We discuss emerging features of international carbon market governance in the public and private domain, including political and technical issues. Fragmented governance is characterized by different degrees of transparency, centralization, and scales. We assess the crunch issues in the Article 6 negotiations through the lens of these governance features and their effectiveness, focusing on governance principles and their operationalization to ensure environmental integrity and avoid double counting.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna-Mari Ahonen & Juliana Kessler & Axel Michaelowa & Aglaja Espelage & Stephan Hoch, 2022. "Governance of Fragmented Compliance and Voluntary Carbon Markets Under the Paris Agreement," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 235-245.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:235-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4759
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Axel Michaelowa & Katharina Michaelowa & Igor Shishlov & Dario Brescia, 2021. "Catalysing private and public action for climate change mitigation: the World Bank’s role in international carbon markets," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 120-132, January.
    2. Lambert Schneider & Stephanie La Hoz Theuer & Andrew Howard & Kelley Kizzier & Martin Cames, 2020. "Outside in? Using international carbon markets for mitigation not covered by nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 18-29, January.
    3. Katharina Michaelowa & Axel Michaelowa, 2017. "The growing influence of the UNFCCC Secretariat on the clean development mechanism," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 247-269, April.
    4. Harriet Bulkeley & Liliana Andonova & Karin Bäckstrand & Michele Betsill & Daniel Compagnon & Rosaleen Duffy & Ans Kolk & Matthew Hoffmann & David Levy & Peter Newell & Tori Milledge & Matthew Paters, 2012. "Governing Climate Change Transnationally: Assessing the Evidence from a Database of Sixty Initiatives," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 591-612, August.
    5. Axel Michaelowa & Igor Shishlov & Dario Brescia, 2019. "Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris Agreement," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(6), November.
    6. Luca Lo Re & Jane Ellis, 2021. "Operationalising the Article 6.4 mechanism: Options and implications of CDM activity transition and new activity registration," OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers 2021/02, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kreibich, Nico & Schulze-Steinen, Max, 2023. "The EU as a normative power? Fighting greenwashing and promoting the integrity of corporate climate action within and outside Article 6 of the Paris Agreement," Wuppertal Reports 25, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    2. Haotong Jiang & Liuyang Yao & Xueru Bai & Hua Li, 2023. "Dynamic Analysis and Simulation of the Feasibility and Stability of Innovative Carbon Emission Reduction Projects Entering the Carbon-Trading Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Shiyi Wu & Rui Niu, 2024. "Development of carbon finance in China based on the hybrid MCDM method," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphael Calel & Jonathan Colmer & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant, 2021. "Do carbon offsets offset carbon?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1808, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    3. Katharina Michaelowa & Axel Michaelowa & Bernhard Reinsberg & Igor Shishlov, 2020. "Do Multilateral Development Bank Trust Funds Allocate Climate Finance Efficiently?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Rachel Einecker & Andrew Kirby, 2020. "Climate Change: A Bibliometric Study of Adaptation, Mitigation and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Stranadko, Nataliya, 2021. "EU-US climate cooperation: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the Paris agreement," Discussion Papers 02/2021, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    6. Dylan Gibson & Leslie A. Duram, 2020. "Shifting Discourse on Climate and Sustainability: Key Characteristics of the Higher Education Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Guitao Zhang & Xiao Zhang & Hao Sun & Xinyu Zhao, 2021. "Three-Echelon Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Equilibrium under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:75-84 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Jörn Ege & Michael W. Bauer, 2017. "How Financial Resources Affect the Autonomy of International Public Administrations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s5), pages 75-84, August.
    10. Saurabh Thakur, 2021. "From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond: The Emerging Politics of Climate Change," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 77(3), pages 366-383, September.
    11. Michelle Betsill & Navroz K. Dubash & Matthew Paterson & Harro van Asselt & Antto Vihma & Harald Winkler, 2015. "Building Productive Links between the UNFCCC and the Broader Global Climate Governance Landscape," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, May.
    12. Castán Broto, Vanesa, 2017. "Urban Governance and the Politics of Climate change," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-15.
    13. David Horan, 2021. "The SDGs as an Integrative Framework to Assess Coherence of Transnational Multistakeholder Partnerships for SIDS," Working Papers 202110, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    14. Jorge Fernández & Macarena Larrea, 2021. "Presentation," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 99(01), pages 31-41.
    15. Wolfgang Buchholz & Dirk Rübbelke, 2020. "Overstraining International Climate Finance: When Conflicts of Objectives Threaten Its Succes," Working Papers 2020.17, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Jean-Frédéric Morin, 2020. "Concentration despite competition: The organizational ecology of technical assistance providers," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-107, January.
    17. Thomas Hale, 2016. "“All Hands on Deck”: The Paris Agreement and Nonstate Climate Action," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 12-22, August.
    18. Paolo De Pascali & Annamaria Bagaini, 2018. "Energy Transition and Urban Planning for Local Development. A Critical Review of the Evolution of Integrated Spatial and Energy Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Sander Chan & Robert Falkner & Harro van Asselt & Matthew Goldberg, 2015. "Strengthening non-state climate action: a progress assessment of commitments launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit," GRI Working Papers 216, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    20. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:51-61 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Barbara Saerbeck & Mareike Well & Helge Jörgens & Alexandra Goritz & Nina Kolleck, 2020. "Brokering Climate Action: The UNFCCC Secretariat Between Parties and Nonparty Stakeholders," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(2), pages 105-127, May.
    22. Bikramaditya Ghosh & Spyros Papathanasiou & Vandita Dar & Konstantinos Gravas, 2022. "Bubble in Carbon Credits during COVID-19: Financial Instability or Positive Impact (“Minsky” or “Social”)?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:235-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.