IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/briefi/v13y2020i30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerabilities and Benefits of Mega-Scale Agri-Food Processing Facilities in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Jared Carlberg

    (University of Manitoba)

Abstract

This paper explores the vulnerabilities associated with mega-scale agri-food processing facilities in the wake of Canada’s COVID-19 outbreak and associated disruptions to the food supply chain and food security as the result of disease outbreak-induced plant closures. The current system of mega-scale facilities has come about as a result of powerful economic incentives associated with economies of size and scale, which allow larger-scale facilities to spread fixed costs across more units of output, leading to lower per-unit costs, greater levels of profitability, and, in the case of the agri-food sector, lower prices and enhanced food security. Governmental and regulatory policies such as tax incentives for investment in large plants (to bring jobs into communities) and allowing the anti-competitive effects of larger/fewer plants to be a secondary consideration to efficiencies have also contributed to the phenomenon of large plant size. Unfortunately, however, increased plant size also requires more workers which can lead to increased risk of disease spread. Moreover, with fewer and larger plants, if a disease like COVID-19 is detected and a plant idled or shut down as a result, the impact of any individual plant being closed upon the food supply and food security is much greater.            Three potential strategic policy options to address this are explored. The first is the introduction of a series of smaller, regional facilities which would greater match commodity availability to processing capacity. For example, Canada’s cattle slaughter capacity does not closely resemble the location of its cattle herd. A second possible option would be the encouragement of alternative ownership structures such as the 1990s-era “New Generation Co-operative†which would be farmer-owned and geographically dispersed. The third (and most likely) option is the introduction of greater levels of mechanization, which would require fewer workers, and increased intra-plant distancing and safety measures for those workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jared Carlberg, 2020. "Vulnerabilities and Benefits of Mega-Scale Agri-Food Processing Facilities in Canada," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(20), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:briefi:v:13:y:2020:i:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/AgriFood-Processing-Carlberg.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Hoekman, 2004. "Policies Facilitating Firm Adjustment to Globalization," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 457-473, Autumn.
    2. Jasper GRASHUIS & Michael COOK, 2018. "An Examination Of New Generation Cooperatives In The Upper Midwest: Successes, Failures, And Limitations," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(4), pages 623-644, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jared Carlberg, 2021. "Interprovincial Trade Barriers in Canada: Options for Moving Forward," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(23), October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghani,Syed Ejaz & Grover,Arti & Kerr,Sari & Kerr,William Robert, 2016. "Will market competition trump gender discrimination in India ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7814, The World Bank.
    2. Mark Gehlhar & Anita Regmi & Spyro Stefanou & Barry Zoumas, 2006. "Managing Firm Competitiveness in Global Markets," Working Papers 0714, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    3. Jasper Grashuis, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Survival: Strategic Adaptation to External Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Ausloos, Marcel & Eskandary, Ali & Kaur, Parmjit & Dhesi, Gurjeet, 2019. "Evidence for Gross Domestic Product growth time delay dependence over Foreign Direct Investment. A time-lag dependent correlation study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 527(C).
    5. Dong, Hao & Dacre, Nicholas & Bailey, Adrian, 2021. "Sustainable Agile Project Management in Complex Agriculture Projects: An Institutional Theory Perspective," SocArXiv v4je2, Center for Open Science.
    6. Ahmed, Gulzar & Arshad Khan, Muhammad & Afzal, Muhammad, 2015. "Trade Liberalization and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from Pakistan," MPRA Paper 70744, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Mar 2016.
    7. Manouchehrabadi, Behrang & Letizia, Paolo & Hendrikse, George, 2021. "Governance of collective entrepreneurship," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 370-389.
    8. Timothy Waring & Taylor Lange & Sujan Chakraborty, 2022. "Institutional adaptation in the evolution of the ‘co-operative principles’," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 333-365, January.
    9. Correa, Paulo & Dayoub, Mariam & Francisco, Manuela, 2007. "Identifying supply-side constraints to export performance in Ecuador : an exercise with Investment Climate Survey data," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4179, The World Bank.
    10. Bogetoft, Peter, 2021. "How upstream cooperatives limit downstream holdups," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-168.
    11. Michael L. Cook, 2018. "A Life Cycle Explanation of Cooperative Longevity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Jasper Grashuis, 2018. "Joint ownership by farmers and investors in the agri-food industry: an exploratory study of the limited cooperative association," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Jasper Grashuis & Theodoros Skevas, 2023. "What is the benefit of membership in farm producer organizations? The case of coffee producers in Peru," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 423-443, June.
    14. Petrit Gashi, 2014. "Human Capital and Export Decisions: The Case of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kosovo," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 16(2), pages 91-120, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:briefi:v:13:y:2020:i:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.