IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cha/ysa001/v3y2010i1p401-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entscheidungsprozesse im landwirtschaftlichen Pachtlandmarkt

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Häusler

Abstract

Pachtland ist ein zentraler Produktionsfaktor für die Schweizer Landwirtschaft. Allerdings ist der Markt, über den Pachtland ge-handelt wird, in verschiedener Hinsicht imperfekt. Zum einen ha-ben agrarpolitische Instrumente einen marktverzerrenden Einfluss. Zum anderen beeinflussen fehlende Anonymität und unvollständi-ge Information die Pachtlandallokation. In drei strukturell verschiedenen Regionen – Freiamt (AG), Fricktal (AG) und Prättigau (GR) wurden 859 Landwirte – also potentielle Pachtlandnachfrager – schriftlich befragt, um in Erfahrung zu brin-gen, welche Faktoren die Pachtlandallokation beeinflussen und wie die Pachtzinse gebildet werden. Es zeigte sich, dass bei der Vergabe von Pachtland die Pächter-Verpächter-Beziehung den grössten Einfluss auf den Handelsausgang hat. In den beiden Aar-gauer Regionen werden die Höchstpachtzinse mehrheitlich über-schritten. Neben der Qualität der Parzelle haben die regionale Knappheit von Pachtland und die betriebliche Tierdichte einen entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Pachtzinse. Zur ökonomisch effi-zienteren Allokation von Pachtland sollte eine Abschaffung der Höchstpachtzinsen in Zusammenhang mit flankierenden Mass-nahmen in Erwägung gezogen werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Häusler, 2010. "Entscheidungsprozesse im landwirtschaftlichen Pachtlandmarkt," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 3(1), pages 401-421.
    • Handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:401-421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://archive.jsagr.org/v3/YSA2010_14_Haeusler_401_421.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurrelmann, Annette, 2008. "Analysing agricultural land markets as organisations: An empirical study in Poland," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 338-349, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhllima, Edvin & Rama, Klodjan & Imami, Drini, 2021. "Agriculture land markets in transition - The inherited challenge of the post-communist land reform in Albania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Chobotová, Veronika, 2013. "The role of market-based instruments for biodiversity conservation in Central and Eastern Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 41-50.
    3. Pletichová, D. & Gebeltová, Z., 2013. "Development of Market Prices of Agricultural Land within the Conditions of the EU," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Bartosz Mickiewicz & Aneta Zaremba & Milena Bera, 2021. "Analysis of the Agricultural Land Market in Selected Poviats of the West Pomeranian Voivodeship," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 1089-1099.
    5. Tisdell, Clement A., 2008. "BEHAVIOURS OF CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS. Analysis based on New (and not so new) Institutional Economics," Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources Discussion Papers 6185, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pachtland; Strukturwandel; Höchstpreise; Direktzah-lungen;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:401-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Briner (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jsagr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.