IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v72y2019i05p03-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deutsche Bahn between public service provider and profit: is it time for a radical restructuring?

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Lutz
  • Christian Böttger
  • Alexander Kirchner
  • Günter Knieps

Abstract

Long-distance trains arrive too late, cooperation between units isn’t working, profit forecasts are pessimistic, freight traffic is making losses, and the infrastructure is underfinanced: Deutsche Bahn is coming in for a great deal of criticism. How to achieve tangible improvements for customers? Are fundamental structural reforms necessary? Richard Lutz, CEO of Deutsche Bahn AG, points out that the pursuit of “growth on rails” has pushed the system to its capacity limits in terms of infrastructure, vehicles, and personnel. Bottlenecks are increasingly putting a strain on the quality of operations and on customers. The “Agenda for a Better Railway” is DB’s answer to this challenge and plots a path to sustainable success for the company. This path will be longer than expected and the company will have to invest significantly more than previously planned. The focus is on effective infrastructure, better rolling stock, and additional personnel. This is how DB is laying the foundations for urgent improvements in quality, punctuality, and reliability. He concludes: “We don’t need a radical transformation, we need to put in a joint effort to support capacity, growth, customers, and quality.” Christian Böttger of the University of Applied Sciences Berlin proposes short-term financial stabilization of DB AG. This might be achieved by selling Arriva, and possibly also Schenker. Then the company could finance upcoming investments and pay off debts. In addition, the governance of the company should be improved. Since DB AG cannot afford the infrastructure investments necessary to achieve the objective of doubling transportation volumes, these funds would therefore have to come from the German federal government. Overall, he assumes that it will take many years to solve the rail network’s problems. For Alexander Kirchner, Chairman of the Rail and Transport Union, “giving rail reliably more money and a clear political mandate ... are the number one solution to the problem.” In his view, it is first and foremost the owner—the German federal government—that bears the responsibility for how the entire rail system is suffering. For years now, instead of investing in infrastructure maintenance, wear and tear has been the order of the day. A radical restructuring would therefore be necessary with regard to financing the rail infrastructure. Günter Knieps of the University of Freiburg deals with the question of identifying the upheavals that advances in information and communication technologies will bring to future rail networks and the opportunities and challenges that will accompany those upheavals. The digital shift towards the Internet of Things could fundamentally change the future role of rail: in the markets for mobility services, in the area of fully automated trains, in the area of predictive train maintenance, in the area of train monitoring systems, and in establishing digital signaling.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Lutz & Christian Böttger & Alexander Kirchner & Günter Knieps, 2019. "Deutsche Bahn between public service provider and profit: is it time for a radical restructuring?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(05), pages 03-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:05:p:03-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2019-05-lutz-etal-deutsche-bahn-2019-03-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Günter Knieps, 2017. "Internet of Things, future networks, and the economics of virtual networks," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(3-4), pages 240-255, September.
    2. Knieps, Günter, 2019. "Internet of Things, big data and the economics of networked vehicles," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 171-181.
    3. Itf, 2016. "Shared Mobility: Innovation for Liveable Cities," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 21, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerken, Paul & Kotzab, Herbert & Blumenstein, Lennard & Buse, Franz & von Euen, Nils & Mucker, Kevin & Zöllner, Laura, 2022. "Digitalization of rail freight transport," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 403-435, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Günter Knieps, 2019. "Internet der Dinge und die Zukunft der Netzökonomie [Internet of Things and the Future of Network Economics]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(5), pages 348-354, May.
    2. David P. Ashmore & Roselle Thoreau & Corina Kwami & Nicola Christie & Nicholas A. Tyler, 2020. "Using thematic analysis to explore symbolism in transport choice across national cultures," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 607-640, April.
    3. Manon Feys & Evy Rombaut & Lieselot Vanhaverbeke, 2020. "Experience and Acceptance of Autonomous Shuttles in the Brussels Capital Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Jurva, Risto & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Outila, Tarja & Merisalo, Virve, 2021. "Evolution paths of stakeholder-oriented smart transportation systems based on 5G," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 243151, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Yves Crozet & Jean Coldefy, 2021. "Mobility as a Service (MaaS): a digital roadmap for public transport authorities," Working Papers halshs-03169744, HAL.
    6. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2021. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1733-1765, August.
    7. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 0. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    8. Stocker Volker & Knieps Guenter, 2018. "Network Neutrality Through the Lens of Network Economics," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 115-150, September.
    9. Lucken, Emma & Trapenberg Frick, Karen & Shaheen, Susan, 2019. "“Three Ps in a MOD:” Role for mobility on demand (MOD) public-private partnerships in public transit provision," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2k2550ct, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Lazarus, Jessica R. & Caicedo, Juan D. & Bayen, Alexandre M. & Shaheen, Susan A., 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? Understanding opportunities, challenges, and equity considerations to expanding the market for pooling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 199-222.
    11. David Ennnen & Thorsten Heilker, 2020. "Ride-Hailing Services in Germany: Potential Impacts on Public Transport, Motorized Traffic, and Social Welfare," Working Papers 29, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    12. Wagner, Dirk Nicolas, 2020. "The nature of the Artificially Intelligent Firm - An economic investigation into changes that AI brings to the firm," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    13. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Lazarus, Jessica & Caicedo, Juan & Bayen, Alexandre PhD, 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? Understanding the Time and Price Tradeoffs of OnDemand Ride Users – Opportunities, Challenges, and Social Equity Considerations for Policies to Promote Shared-Ride Services," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt44q6n0mm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Yves Crozet & Georgina Santos & Jean Coldefy, 2019. "Shared mobility and MaaS: Regulatory challenges of urban mobility," Working Papers halshs-03169805, HAL.
    15. Guenter Knieps, 2023. "The Governance of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Network Industries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 24(2-3), pages 57-71, June.
    16. Parcu, Pier Luigi & Innocenti, Niccolò & Carrozza, Chiara, 2022. "Ubiquitous technologies and 5G development. Who is leading the race?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    17. Günter Knieps & Thomas Griese & André Grüttner & Oliver Rottmann & Hans-Wilhelm Schiffer & Gernot Sieg & David Stadelmann & Heiner Monheim, 2018. "Fahrverbote, City-Maut, kostenloser öffentlicher Nahverkehr: Wege aus dem Verkehrskollaps?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(09), pages 03-22, May.
    18. Alexandra König & Tabea Bonus & Jan Grippenkoven, 2018. "Analyzing Urban Residents’ Appraisal of Ridepooling Service Attributes with Conjoint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Akimoto, Keigo & Sano, Fuminori & Oda, Junichiro, 2022. "Impacts of ride and car-sharing associated with fully autonomous cars on global energy consumptions and carbon dioxide emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2019. "The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT): A computational text analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:05:p:03-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.