IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v69y2016i15p03-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Turnaround and Greater Energy Self-Sufficiency: Can Both Be Achieved?

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Strunz
  • Erik Gawel
  • Hubertus Bardt
  • Andreas Seeliger
  • Sibyl D. Steuwer

Abstract

Alongside climate protection, one of the goals of Germany's energy policy is to reduce its dependency on imports of fossil fuels. What impact will the energy turnaround have on import dependency? Is import dependency in the energy sector really a problem? According to Sebastian Strunz and Erik Gawel, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, University of Leipzig, the energy turnaround has no "import dependency problem". The dependence that arose in the past, especially on Russian gas imports, cannot be blamed on energy turnaround goals. To ensure, however, that natural gas does not turn into the "Achilles heel" of the energy turnaround, a diversification of the offering should be introduced in the short and mid-term, and incentives for other flexibility options should be provided in the long term. For Hubertus Bardt, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln, the energy turnaround is structurally dependent on international trade-offs and open electricity markets, and cannot succeed based on the vision of autonomous energy supply. A stronger Europeanisation of energy and electricity policy is of central importance in this instance. The concept of energy independence is pointing in the wrong direction. International division of labour opportunities need to be used to successfully manage the energy turnaround. Andreas Seeliger, Hochschule Niederrhein, underlines that economic efficiency, environmental compatibility and security of provision are the relevant factors; and that the energy turnaround is only one instrument and/or a mix of instruments. The example of the USA also shows that the energy turnaround and energy independence can be achieved simultaneously. Although it may not be possible to draw any final conclusions, based on the present situation the energy turnaround can only be realised at the expense of greater energy independence. Politicians should therefore strive for a slightly more balanced weighting of their targets in the future. Sibyl D. Steuwer, FU Berlin, also emphasises that energy independence is not a stand-alone goal in the triangle of energy policy. Striving for energy independence is more of a strategy for achieving the target value of supply security and minimising dependence on energy imports and foreign policy uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Strunz & Erik Gawel & Hubertus Bardt & Andreas Seeliger & Sibyl D. Steuwer, 2016. "Energy Turnaround and Greater Energy Self-Sufficiency: Can Both Be Achieved?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(15), pages 03-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:15:p:03-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2016-15-strunz-gawel-etal-energiewende-autarkie-2016-08-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2015. "The Green Entrepreneurial State," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-28, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin Yifu Lin, 2017. "Industrial policies for avoiding the middle-income trap: a new structural economics perspective," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 5-18, January.
    2. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    3. Luintel, Kul B. & Khan, Mosahid, 2017. "Ideas production and international knowledge spillovers: Digging deeper into emerging countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1738-1754.
    4. Lionel Nesta & Elena Verdolini & Francesco Vona, 2018. "Threshold Policy Effects and Directed Technical Change in Energy Innovation," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2018-05, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    5. D’Orazio, Paola & Valente, Marco, 2019. "The role of finance in environmental innovation diffusion: An evolutionary modeling approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 417-439.
    6. Singh, Ajit, 2013. "Full Employment in Western Europe and the Regulatory Regime: An Institutional and Historical Analysis Together with a Commentary on Government as an Entrepreneur," MPRA Paper 53038, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Philipp Heimberger & Jakob Kapeller, 2017. "The performativity of potential output: pro-cyclicality and path dependency in coordinating European fiscal policies," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 904-928, September.
    8. Thomas E. Lambert, 2020. "Monopoly capital and innovation: an exploratory assessment of R&D effectiveness," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 36-49, January.
    9. Victoria SIRBU, 2018. "The Role Of The State And Universities In Generating Innovation," CSIE Working Papers, Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), issue 10, pages 74-83, December.
    10. Paola D'Orazio, 2022. "Mapping the emergence and diffusion of climate-related financial policies: Evidence from a cluster analysis on G20 countries," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 169, pages 135-147.
    11. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 25-35.
    12. Filippo Maria D’Arcangelo & Ilai Levin & Alessia Pagani & Mauro Pisu & Åsa Johansson, 2022. "A framework to decarbonise the economy," OECD Economic Policy Papers 31, OECD Publishing.
    13. Francesco Lamperti & Mariana Mazzucato & Andrea Roventini & Gregor Semieniuk, 2019. "The Green Transition: Public Policy, Finance, and the Role of the State," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 88(2), pages 73-88.
    14. Onur Bayar & Thomas J. Chemmanur & Mark H. Liu, "undated". "How to Motivate Fundamental Innovation: Subsidies versus Prizes and the Role of Venture Capital," Working Papers 0175fin, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, revised 06 Jan 2016.
    15. Bernhard Reinsberg & Alexander Kentikelenis & Thomas Stubbs & Lawrence King & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The World System & the Hollowing-out of State Capacity: How Structural Adjustment Programs Impact Bureaucratic Quality in Developing Countries," Working Papers wp503, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Barry W. Brook & Kingsley Edney & Rafaela Hillerbrand & Rasmus Karlsson & Jonathan Symons, 2016. "Energy research within the UNFCCC: a proposal to guard against ongoing climate-deadlock," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 803-813, August.
    17. Daniel Nepelski & Marc Bogdanowicz & Federico Biagi & Paul Desruelle & Giuditta De Prato & Garry Gabison & Giuseppe Piroli & Annarosa Pesole & Nikolaus Thumm & Vincent Van Roy, 2017. "7 ways to boost digital innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe. Key messages from the European innovation policies for the digital shift project," JRC Research Reports JRC104899, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Todeva, Emanuela & Etzkiwitz, Henry, 2013. "The Triple Helix as a Highly Charged Intellectual Enterprise," MPRA Paper 52834, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Giuseppe Calignano & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Nina Hjertvikrem, 2018. "Innovation networks and green restructuring: Which path development can EU Framework Programmes stimulate in Norway?," PEGIS geo-disc-2018_05, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    20. Cristian Mendoza & Eric Salobir O. P., 2017. "Culture at the Bottom of Startups: Reflections on Social Expectations," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 12-22, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q38 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy (includes OPEC Policy)
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:15:p:03-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.