IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v70y2024i2id75-2023-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative system of afforestation in the Czech Republic: A long journey to a new forest

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Baláš

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Josef Gallo

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Marcin Czacharowski

    (Department of Silviculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michal Pástor

    (Department of Silviculture and Forest Production, National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Jaroslav Jankovič

    (Department of Silviculture and Forest Production, National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Igor Štefančík

    (Department of Silviculture and Forest Production, National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Ivan Kuneš

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Hubert Hasenauer

    (Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

This review uses a case study based on an executed afforestation project to comprehensively describe the administrative procedure regarding afforestation of agricultural land in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. We consider the official proceedings for obtaining a permit to land-use change (i.e. changing the nature of land use and the mode of land use in the real estate cadastre) as a very complex and protracted procedure, which can substantially reduce the motivation of people to establish new forests. Therefore, we propose a simplification of the administration process of land-use change. The main idea is to make the procedure as simple as possible in those areas where afforestation is desirable, especially from the environmental point of view. It assumes the possibility of quick, precise and, if possible, automatic distinction whether the afforestation is suitable or not. The situation in the Czech Republic is compared with the surrounding Central-European countries: Poland and Slovakia. In these countries, the official procedure connected with afforestation seems to be rather less complicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Baláš & Josef Gallo & Marcin Czacharowski & Michal Pástor & Jaroslav Jankovič & Igor Štefančík & Ivan Kuneš & Hubert Hasenauer, 2024. "Administrative system of afforestation in the Czech Republic: A long journey to a new forest," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 41-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:70:y:2024:i:2:id:75-2023-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/75/2023-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/75/2023-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/75/2023-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/75/2023-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Kacálek & J. Novák & D. Dušek & J. Bartoš & V. Černohous, 2009. "How does legacy of agriculture play role in formation of afforested soil properties?," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 9-14.
    2. Karl-Ivar Kumm & Anna Hessle, 2020. "Economic Comparison between Pasture-Based Beef Production and Afforestation of Abandoned Land in Swedish Forest Districts," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. J. Vopravil & V. Podrázský & M. Batysta & P. Novák & L. Havelková & M. Hrabalíková, 2015. "Identification of agricultural soils suitable for afforestation in the Czech Republic using a soil database," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 141-147.
    4. Caparros, Alejandro & Jacquemont, Frederic, 2003. "Conflicts between biodiversity and carbon sequestration programs: economic and legal implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 143-157, August.
    5. Jan CUKOR & Martin BALÁŠ & Ivo KUPKA & Marek TUŽINSKÝ, 2017. "The condition of forest stands on afforested agricultural land in the Orlické hory Mts," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. Podrázský & J. Remeš & V. Hart & W. Keith Moser, 2009. "Production and humus form development in forest stands established on agricultural lands - Kostelec nad Černými lesy region," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(7), pages 299-305.
    2. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Economics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sinks: A Review," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 237-269, September.
    3. Liudmila Tripolskaja & Asta Kazlauskaite-Jadzevice & Virgilijus Baliuckas & Almantas Razukas, 2021. "Natural and Managed Grasslands Productivity during Multiyear in Ex-Arable Lands (in the Context of Climate Change)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Hunt, Colin, 2008. "Economy and ecology of emerging markets and credits for bio-sequestered carbon on private land in tropical Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 309-318, June.
    5. Ovando, Paola & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2009. "Land use and carbon mitigation in Europe: A survey of the potentials of different alternatives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 992-1003, March.
    6. Cinthia Soto Golcher & Ingrid J Visseren-Hamakers, 2018. "Framing and integration in the global forest, agriculture and climate change nexus," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(8), pages 1415-1436, December.
    7. Barua, Sepul K. & Lintunen, Jussi & Uusivuori, Jussi & Kuuluvainen, Jari, 2014. "On the economics of tropical deforestation: Carbon credit markets and national policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 36-45.
    8. Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Surface Temperature and Land Cover: A Study Concerning Sardinia, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Jan Vopravil & Pavel Formánek & Jaroslava Janků & Ondřej Holubík & Tomáš Khel, 2021. "Early changes in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former agricultural land," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16(4), pages 228-236.
    10. Alejandro Caparrós & David Zilberman, 2010. "Optimal carbon sequestration path when different biological or physical sequestration," Working Papers 1018, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    11. Susaeta, Andres & Chang, Sun Joseph & Carter, Douglas R. & Lal, Pankaj, 2014. "Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: An application to forest stands in the southern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 47-64.
    12. Chisholm, Ryan A., 2010. "Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1973-1987, August.
    13. Emilio Cerdá & Alejandro Caparrós & Paola Ovando, 2008. "Bioenergía en la Unión Europea," Economic Reports 26-08, FEDEA.
    14. Fuller, Madisen & Baker, Justin & Roberts, Zoey & Latta, Gret & Ohrel, Sara & Gower, Tom, 2023. "Projecting the spatial distribution of tree planting under different policy incentive structures," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 337099, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Alexander V. Prishchepov & Florian Schierhorn & Fabian Löw, 2021. "Unraveling the Diversity of Trajectories and Drivers of Global Agricultural Land Abandonment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8, January.
    16. Rocío Cóndor & Antonino Scarelli & Riccardo Valentini, 2011. "Multicriteria Decision Aid to support Multilateral Environmental Agreements in assessing international forestry projects," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 117-137, May.
    17. Marechal, Kevin & Hecq, Walter, 2006. "Temporary credits: A solution to the potential non-permanence of carbon sequestration in forests?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 699-716, July.
    18. Ivo KUPKA & Martin BALÁŠ & Stanislav MILTNER, 2018. "Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in arid areas of North-Western Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(2), pages 53-58.
    19. Campos, Pablo & Caparros, Alejandro, 2006. "Social and private total Hicksian incomes of multiple use forests in Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 545-557, June.
    20. Carlo Carraro & Francesco Bosello & Enrica De Cian, 2009. "An Analysis of Adaptation as a Response to Climate Change," Working Papers 2009_26, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:70:y:2024:i:2:id:75-2023-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.