IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v58y2012i11id187-2011-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?

Author

Listed:
  • Hana BOHUŠOVÁ

    (Department of Accounting and taxes, faculty of business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Patrik SVOBODA

    (Department of Accounting and taxes, faculty of business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Danuše NERUDOVÁ

    (Department of Accounting and taxes, faculty of business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Agricultural activity differs from other activities carried out by business units to achieve the profit. Agricultural activity is in comparison with other activities of business subjects dependent on the natural and environmental conditions, and therefore the agriculture specialization is narrowly connected with geographical position. The aim of the paper is to identify the possible obstacles in the practical application of the International Accounting Standard 41 (IAS 41) and to suggest the possible ways of their elimination. The comparative analysis of the currently applied rules for agricultural activity reporting and the analysis of the current accounting treatment of agricultural activity under the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were the starting point of the research. This part serves as the basis for own research in which the authors are trying to identify the specifics of agricultural production, biological assets and biological transformation. More suitable methods for their recognition, measurement and reporting were suggested as an alternative to the current treatments. At the end, the results are also confronted with contemporary scientific literature on that topic, which is not very broad. The main reason for the research of the authors in this area is the possible elimination of obstacles in the practical application of the IAS 41.

Suggested Citation

  • Hana BOHUŠOVÁ & Patrik SVOBODA & Danuše NERUDOVÁ, 2012. "Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(11), pages 520-532.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:58:y:2012:i:11:id:187-2011-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/187/2011-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/187/2011-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/187/2011-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/187/2011-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Booth & R. G. Walker, 2003. "Valuation of SGARAs IN THE Wine Industry: Time for Sober Reflection," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(31), pages 52-60, November.
    2. Viorel Lefter & Aureliana Geta Roman, 2007. "IAS 41 Agriculture: Fair Value Accounting," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 5(5(510)), pages 15-22, May.
    3. Charles Elad, 2004. "Fair value accounting in the agricultural sector: some implications for international accounting harmonization," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 621-641.
    4. Christopher Nobes, 2006. "The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 233-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saverio BOZZOLAN & Enrico LAGHI & Marco MATTEI, 2016. "Amendments to the IAS 41 and IAS 16 - implications for accounting of bearer plants," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 160-166.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrik Svoboda & Hana Bohušová, 2017. "Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41: Are There Any Differences between Plant and Animal from a Financial Reporting Point of View?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 327-337.
    2. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    3. Elad, Charles & Shah, Neeta & Agyeman, Charles, 2023. "Accounting classification in the era of International Financial Reporting Standards: The case of Africa," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Hana BOHUSOVA & Patrik SVOBODA, 2017. "Will the amendments to the IAS 16 and IAS 41 influence the value of biological assets?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 53-64.
    5. Rute Gonçalves & Patrícia Lopes, 2014. "Accounting in Agriculture: Disclosure practices of listed firms," FEP Working Papers 530, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    6. Daniel Buda & Hoinaru Razvan & Mocanu Mihaela & Roman Aureliana-Geta, 2019. "IAS 41 and beyond for a sustainable EU agriculture," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 829-839, May.
    7. Laaksonen, Jenni, 2022. "Translation, hegemony and accounting: A critical research framework with an illustration from the IFRS context," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Argilés bosch, Josep M.a & Aliberch, Anna Sabata & Blandón, Josep García, 2012. "A Comparative Study of Difficulties in Accounting Preparation and Judgement in Agriculture Using Fair Value and Historical Cost for Biological Assets Valuation," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 109-142.
    9. Goncharov, Igor & Werner, Joerg R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2009. "Legislative demands and economic realities: Company and group accounts compared," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 334-362, December.
    10. Adhikari, Ajay & Bansal, Manish & Kumar, Ashish, 2021. "IFRS convergence and accounting quality: India a case study," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. Raluca Valeria RATIU, 2012. "Accounting Regulations for Goodwill at a National, European and International Level," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 60(4), pages 249-258, November.
    12. Adriana TIRON-TUDOR & Teodora Viorica FĂRCAŞ & Ioana DRAGU & Ecaterina Monica MOISE, 2020. "Non-Financial Reporting in Romania in the pre-Directive 2014/95/EU Period (1990-2013)," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 1(5), pages 63-72, May.
    13. Petaibanlue, Jirada & Walker, Martin & Lee, Edward, 2015. "When did analyst forecast accuracy benefit from increased cross-border comparability following IFRS adoption in the EU?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 278-291.
    14. Elbakry, Ashraf E. & Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. & Abdou, Hussein A. & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2017. "Comparative evidence on the value relevance of IFRS-based accounting information in Germany and the UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 10-30.
    15. Monica Laura ZLATI & Cristian MIRICA, 2021. "Biological Assets Accounting In The Agricultural Sector," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 15(25), pages 1-7, February.
    16. Abdul Majid, Jamaliah, 2015. "Reporting incentives, ownership concentration by the largest outside shareholder, and reported goodwill impairment losses," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 199-214.
    17. BATCA-DUMITRU Corina-Graziella & ILINCUTA Lucian-Dorel & HURLOIU Lacramioara-Rodica & RUSU Bianca-Florentina, 2020. "Case Studies And Examples Of The Accounting Treatment Prescribed For Biological Assets And Agricultural Products By Ias 41 Agriculture," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 77-96, June.
    18. Stephen A. Zeff & Christopher W. Nobes, 2010. "Commentary: Has Australia (or Any Other Jurisdiction) ‘Adopted’ IFRS?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 178-184, June.
    19. Christian Gross, 2016. "The Effect of the German Accounting Law Modernization Act on the Comparability of Private Local GAAP and IFRS Firms," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(3), pages 423-460, December.
    20. Burietz, Aurore & Oosterlinck, Kim & Szafarz, Ariane, 2017. "Europe vs. the U.S.: A new look at the syndicated loan pricing puzzle," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 50-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:58:y:2012:i:11:id:187-2011-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.