IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/journl/v35y2017i1p163-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study Regarding The Financial Reporting Of Intangible Assets. Case Of Romanian Pharmaceutical Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ancuta Alina Gheorghe

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, "Dunarea de Jos")

  • Moisescu Florentina

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, "Dunarea de Jos")

Abstract

The accounting treatment of intangible assets is a particularly complex and important issue for today's economy, a knowledge based economy. For nowdays companies, these assets are inductors for success and an important factor for achieving competitive advantage. Also, these asstets are an important part of the financial statements. With the increasing weight and importance of the intangible assets the need for financial information of of financial statements’users has changed and the current accounting system makes it difficult to cope with these developments. Because of the uncertainty that strikes intangible assets, accounting can not capture their growing importance. Accordingly investors and other users of financial statements may not receive complete and relevant information for decision making. Basic questions arise here: Does the accounting treatment of intangible assets affect the relevance of financial information? ; May this treatment cause a misallocation of resources? The weakness is that the current accounting system can not capture all significant intangible values. Along with trying to answer the above question the purpose of this paper is to present the accounting treatment related to intangible assets according to international financial reporting standards and to analyze to what extent the accounting treatment of intangible assets affect the relevance of financial information for Romanian pharmaceutical companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange The research was qualitative type, based on empirical data recorded on a sample of 5 Romanian pharmaceutical companies, listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. The qualitative side is given by the fact that the study is based on interpretation, explanation, understanding.

Suggested Citation

  • Ancuta Alina Gheorghe & Moisescu Florentina, 2017. "Study Regarding The Financial Reporting Of Intangible Assets. Case Of Romanian Pharmaceutical Industry," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 35(1), pages 163-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:163-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/170122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Zéghal & Anis Maaloul, 2011. "The accounting treatment of intangibles – A critical review of the literature," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 262-274, December.
    2. Huang, Shi-Ming & Ou, Chin-Shyh & Chen, Chyi-Miaw & Lin, Binshan, 2006. "An empirical study of relationship between IT investment and firm performance: A resource-based perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 984-999, September.
    3. Iuliana Oana MIHAI & Camelia MIHALCIUC & Cosmin MIHAI, 2011. "Accounting Treatment For R&D Activities In Accordance With Ifrs And Romanian Legislation," The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 11(1(13)), pages 226-236, June.
    4. Ahmed, Kamran & Falk, Haim, 2006. "The value relevance of management's research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 231-264.
    5. Loukas Spanos, 2005. "Corporate governance in Greece: developments and policy implications," Finance 0502017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Robert W. McGee, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Transition Economies," Springer Books, in: Robert W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Springer.
    7. Martin Falk, 2013. "New Empirical Findings for International Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 30," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46891, April.
    8. Zéghal, Daniel & Maaloul, Anis, 2011. "The accounting treatment of intangibles – A critical review of the literature," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 262-274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2019. "Does Equity Market Differently Perceive IC Management and Disclosure Behaviours?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 756-775, June.
    2. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D?Amico & Sabato Vinci, 2019. "The effectiveness of intellectual capital disclosure in market assessments of corporate value creation," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 5-35.
    3. Christian Nielsen & Gunnar Rimmel & Tadanori Yosano, 2015. "Outperforming markets: IC and the long-term performance of Japanese IPOs," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 83-96, June.
    4. Yuri Biondi & Antoine Rebérioux, 2012. "The governance of intangibles: Rethinking financial reporting and the board of directors," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 279-293, December.
    5. Stephen Penman, 2021. "Accounting for Risk," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 15(4), pages 373-507, November.
    6. Marques, Mário & Pinho, Carlos & Montenegro, Tânia Menezes, 2019. "The effect of international income shifting on the link between real investment and corporate taxation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Dyhdalewicz Anna & Widelska Urszula, 2017. "Accouting and marketing dimensions of innovations," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Iuliana Oana MIHAI & Riana Iren RADU, 2015. "Accounting Treatment for Separate and Consolidated Financial Statements," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 140-145.
    9. Alexander Ebner & Fabian Bocek, 2015. "Best Practices as to How to Support Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 101," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58258, April.
    10. Li, Qing & Wu, Yanrui, 2020. "Intangible capital, ICT and sector growth in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).
    11. Iuliana Oana MIHAI, 2013. "The Influence of Corporate Governance and Ownership Concentration on Company Performance - Evidence from Bucharest Stock Exchange," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 79-88.
    12. Coluccia, Daniela & Dabić, Marina & Del Giudice, Manlio & Fontana, Stefano & Solimene, Silvia, 2020. "R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 259-271.
    13. Rubio Martín, Gracia & Rodríguez Paredes, Mercedes & Maroto Acín, Juan Antonio, 2013. "La escasa relevancia de la información contable sobre los activos intangibles en la valoración de las empresas innovadoras españolas: el caso de los sectores farmacéutico y biotecnológico || The Low I," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 16(1), pages 68-94, December.
    14. Lorena Mitrione & George Tanewski & Jacqueline Birt, 2014. "The relevance to firm valuation of research and development expenditure in the Australian health-care industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(3), pages 425-452, August.
    15. Marco Wölfle, 2009. "Information-based trade in Russia and the effects of listing abroad," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 229-262, November.
    16. Abeysekera, Indra, 2016. "Does the classification of intangibles matter? An equivalence testing," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 135-142.
    17. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Dimitrios Mitskinis & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2021. "The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 24-41, March.
    18. Dinh, Tami & Schultze, Wolfgang, 2022. "Accounting for R&D on the income statement? Evidence on non-discretionary vs. discretionary R&D capitalization under IFRS in Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Salvatore Loprevite & Daniela Rupo & Bruno Ricca, 2018. "Integrated Reporting Practices in Europe and Value Relevance of Accounting Information under the Framework of IIRC," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-1, March.
    20. Amjad Ali & Wajid Alim & Jawad Ahmed & Sabahat Nisar, 2022. "Yoke of corporate governance and firm performance: A study of listed firms in Pakistan," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 13(1), pages 08-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:163-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan MICUDA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.