IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/revmkt/v16y2018i1p49-84n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflective and Impulsive Predictors of Unhealthy Snack Impulse Buying

Author

Listed:
  • Moayery Meysam
  • Narvaiza Cantín Lorea
  • Gibaja Martíns Juan José

    (Universidad de Deusto - Campus San Sebastian, San Sebastian, Spain)

Abstract

While impulse buying has been conceptualized as a product of impulses, this study proposes that both reflective and impulsive determinants can outline impulse buying. Following a dual-system model that distinguishes between a reflective and an impulsive system, we hypothesized that unhealthy snack impulse buying can be differentially influenced by either impulsive system or reflective system as a function of self-regulatory resources. Participants in the experiment were randomly assigned to one of the conditions of the two-group design (self-regulatory resources depletion vs. control condition); then they were given the opportunity to take part in a mock store spontaneous buying situation. While the impulsive system was represented by impulse buying tendency and unhealthy snack buying habit, dietary restraint represented the reflective system. The dependent variables were the number of unhealthy snacks purchased and the percentage of unhealthy snacks purchased. The results provided the first empirical foundation for reflective and impulsive aspects of impulse buying behavior. The findings showed that self-regulatory resources moderate the impact of both reflective and impulsive determinants on unhealthy snack impulse buying. While the reflective system (dietary restraint) only determined the behavior in the high self-regulatory resource condition, the impulsive system (impulse buying tendency and habit) associated with the behavior when self-regulatory resources were diminished. There was one exceptional case in which habit determined the percentage of unhealthy snacks purchased even in the high self-regulatory resource condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Moayery Meysam & Narvaiza Cantín Lorea & Gibaja Martíns Juan José, 2018. "Reflective and Impulsive Predictors of Unhealthy Snack Impulse Buying," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 49-84, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:49-84:n:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/roms.2018.16.issue-1/roms-2018-0038/roms-2018-0038.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:49-84:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.