IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v69y2018i1p341-365n15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordoliberalismus vs. Wirtschaftspopulismus: Unterschiedliche Konzepte für ähnliche Wähler

Author

Listed:
  • Hesse Nils
  • Karstens Felix

Abstract

Die Wähler Donald Trumps, des Brexits und populistischer Parteien leitet weniger materielle Sorgen, grundsätzliche Vorbehalte gegen internationalen Freihandel oder eine ausgeprägte Fremdenfeindlichkeit. Vielmehr empfinden diese Wähler stärker als andere Wählergruppen eine politische Ohnmacht, Unbehagen angesichts des gesellschaftlichem (Werte-)Wandel und Verunsicherung über eine bislang unbekannte Migrationsdynamik. Welche Antworten können etablierte Parteien diesen Wählern geben, ohne die Position wirtschaftspopulistischer Parteien einfach zu kopieren? Wie kann der zunehmenden Spaltung der Gesellschaft Einhalt geboten werden? Dieser Beitrag zeigt, dass es dazu keiner neuen politischer Konzepte und auch keiner Umverteilungsprogramme oder protektionistischen Aktionismus bedarf. Vielmehr bietet das bewährte ordoliberale Konzept überzeugende Antworten auch für eliten- und migrationsskeptische Wähler und kann so geistige Risse in der Gesellschaft kitten.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesse Nils & Karstens Felix, 2018. "Ordoliberalismus vs. Wirtschaftspopulismus: Unterschiedliche Konzepte für ähnliche Wähler," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 341-365, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:341-365:n:15
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2019-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2019-0016
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2019-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inglehart, Ronald F. & Norris, Pippa, 2016. "Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash," Working Paper Series 16-026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. repec:ces:ifodic:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:50000000000854 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. LewisDavis & Sumit S.Deole, 2018. "Immigration and the Rise of Far-right Parties in Europe," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(04), pages 10-15, January.
    4. Stuart Gietel-Basten, 2016. "Why Brexit? The Toxic Mix of Immigration and Austerity," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 42(4), pages 673-680, December.
    5. Torben M. Andersen & Giuseppe Bertola & John Driffill & Clemens Fuest & Harold James & Jan-Egbert Sturm & Branko Uroševic, 2017. "The EEAG Report on the European Economy 2017: Economics of Populism," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 01-110, March.
    6. Hilmer, Richard & Kohlrausch, Bettina & Müller-Hilmer, Rita & Gagné, Jérémie, 2017. "Einstellung und soziale Lebenslage: Eine Spurensuche nach Gründen für rechtspopulistische Orientierung, auch unter Gewerkschaftsmitgliedern," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 044, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    7. Inglehart, Ronald, 1971. "The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 991-1017, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian R Gordon, 2018. "In what sense left behind by globalisation? Looking for a less reductionist geography of the populist surge in Europe," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 95-113.
    2. Vanschoonbeek, Jakob, 2020. "Divided We Stad: a Fiscal Bargaining Model for Divided Countries," MPRA Paper 101863, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Manuel Hensmans & van Bommel, 2019. "Brexit, the NHS and the double-edged sword of populism: Contributor to agonistic democracy or vehicle of ressentiment?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/291153, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Kurecic Petar & Kokotovic Filip, 2018. "Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Brexit Referendum and Post-Referendum Events on Selected Stock Exchange Indexes," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 7-16, June.
    5. Gersbach, Hans & Köhler-Schindler, Laurin, 2019. "Politsplaining: Populism Breeds Populism," CEPR Discussion Papers 13919, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    7. Rosalie L Tung & Günter K Stahl, 2018. "The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we are headed," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1167-1189, December.
    8. Indra de Soysa & Synøve Almås, 2019. "Does Ethnolinguistic Diversity Preclude Good Governance? A Comparative Study with Alternative Data, 1990‐2015," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 604-636, November.
    9. Veenhoven, Ruut, 1990. "Inequality in happiness: inequality in countries compared across countries," MPRA Paper 11275, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Tausch, Arno, 2018. "The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data," MPRA Paper 90093, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Vigvári, Gábor, 2022. "Transzformáció és a populizmus a visegrádi országokban [Transformation and populism in the V4 countries]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 339-366.
    12. Ali, Maged & Azab, Nahed & Sorour, M. Karim & Dora, Manoj, 2019. "Integration v. polarisation among social media users: Perspectives through social capital theory on the recent Egyptian political landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 461-473.
    13. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2021. "Multinational Enterprises And Economic Nationalism: A Strategic Analysis Of Culture," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 19-66.
    14. Tito Boeri & Prachi Mishra & Chris Papageorgiou & Antonio Spilimbergo, 2018. "A Dialogue between a Populist and an Economist," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 191-195, May.
    15. Eriksson, Katherine & Alsan, Marcella & Niemesh, Gregory T., 2020. "Understanding the Success of the Know-Nothing Party," CEPR Discussion Papers 15562, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Hubert Tworzecki, 2019. "Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 97-119, January.
    17. Liesbet Hooghe & Tobias Lenz & Gary Marks, 2019. "Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 731-743, December.
    18. David Held & Robert Schütze & Charles S. Maier, 2017. "Democratic Dangers Beyond Borders," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s6), pages 78-86, October.
    19. Jasiecki Krzysztof, 2018. "The strength and weaknesses of the varieties of capitalism approach: the case of Central and Eastern Europe," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(4), pages 328-342, December.
    20. Walter Bossert & Andrew E Clark & Conchita D’Ambrosio & Anthony Lepinteur, 2023. "Economic insecurity and political preferences," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 802-825.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ordoliberalismus; Populismus; Protektionismus; Wahlverhalten; Wirtschaftspopulismus; B25; B52; D72; F52; F68;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • F68 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:341-365:n:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.