IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v51y2000i1p383-404n17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Austritt erlaubt? Die Verfassung der Europäischen Union braucht ein Sezessionsrecht

Author

Listed:
  • Doering Detmar

Abstract

The topic of „secession“ is usually associated with violence and political disorder. There are, however, more positive aspects to be found in it. Secession may also be seen as a defence against centralistic and discriminatory legislation. Especially in the case of the European Union the right of secession may be discussed in a meaningful way, because the immanent centralising tendencies of the EU could be countered effectively this way. Otherwise the EU with its cultural, social and economic diversity could be likely to turn its policies into an illiberal and anti-free market direction in the long run. Secession as such does not necessarily counter such policies successfully. What is needed is a proper theory of secession with some practical applications. It should be based on rules that strengthen individual choice and democracy. In existing federations/ confederations like the EU it is possible and desirable to define the right of secession as a constitutional right. Secession, then, can be carried out peacefully under the rule of law. A constitutional right would also enable the „lower“ tiers of government to exercise pressure against discriminatory legislation. These advantages can be enhanced by concrete rules. These rules should concern federal property, the time horizon of secession, the public debt and the democratic criteria for secession (such as qualified majorities). Also it has to be settled whether unilateral or bilateral secession should be allowed. In the case of the EU unilateralism seems to recommendable, because otherwise the EU would be the last instance in the decision making process. The inclusion of a right of secession in a European constitution will strengthen the principle of subsidiarity and the right of „last resort“ of the member states. Another important outcome would be a type of competitive federalism in which free markets could flourish.

Suggested Citation

  • Doering Detmar, 2000. "Austritt erlaubt? Die Verfassung der Europäischen Union braucht ein Sezessionsrecht," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 51(1), pages 383-404, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:51:y:2000:i:1:p:383-404:n:17
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2000-0117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2000-0117
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2000-0117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Vibert, 1999. "How Not to Write a Constitution—The Maastricht/Amsterdam Treaties," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 149-166, June.
    2. Roland Vaubel, 1996. "Constitutional safeguards against centralization in federal states: An international cross-section analysis," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 79-102, June.
    3. Frey, Bruno S., 1997. "Ein neuer Föderalismus für Europa: Die Idee der FOCJ," Beiträge zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 127, number urn:isbn:9783161467905, December.
    4. Adams Charles, 1998. "Those Dirty Rotten Taxes The Tax Revolts That Built America," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lars Feld, 2005. "The European constitution project from the perspective of constitutional political economy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 417-448, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartholomae, Florian W., 2017. "Economic effects of recent social and technological developments," Working Papers in Economics 2017,4, Bundeswehr University Munich, Economic Research Group.
    2. Roland Vaubel, 2013. "Secession in the European Union," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 288-302, October.
    3. Andreas Kyriacou, 2009. "Decision rules, membership and political centralization in the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 143-158, April.
    4. Bernhard Boockmann, 2003. "Mixed Motives: An Empirical Analysis of ILO Roll-Call Voting," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 263-285, December.
    5. Hebous, Shafik & Weichenrieder, Alfons J., 2015. "Towards a fiscal union? On the acceptability of a fiscal transfer system in the eurozone," SAFE White Paper Series 28, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    6. Wolfgang Kerber, 2003. "Wettbewerbsföderalismus als Integrationskonzept für die Europäische Union," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 43-64, February.
    7. Bruno S. Frey, 2005. "Zwei Utopien jenseits des Weltstaates und der Anarchie," IEW - Working Papers 258, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    8. Shafik Hebous & Alfons Weichenrieder, 2016. "Toward a Mutualization of European Unemployment Insurance? On Limiting the Downsides of a Fiscal Transfer System for the Eurozone," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 62(2), pages 376-395.
    9. Peter Friedrich, 2011. "Legal European Company Forms to Realize Cross Border FOCJ - Functional Overlapping Competing Jurisdictions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1009, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Lammers, Konrad, 1999. "Europäische Integration und räumliche Entwicklungsprozesse: Wo bleibt die nationale Ebene?," HWWA Discussion Papers 75, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    11. Ugo Panizza, 2004. "Decentralising the public sector: What Drives Fiscal Decentralisation?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(1), pages 21-25, October.
    12. Christoph A. Schaltegger & Lars P. Feld, 2001. "On Government Centralization and Budget Referendums: Evidence from Switzerland," CESifo Working Paper Series 615, CESifo.
    13. Jürgen Wandel, 2019. "Prospects for an ordoliberal reform of the European Union," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 28-43, February.
    14. Lars Feld, 2005. "The European constitution project from the perspective of constitutional political economy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 417-448, March.
    15. Sideras Jörn, 2001. "Konstitutionelle Äquivalenz und Ordnungswahl," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 52(1), pages 103-130, January.
    16. Boockmann, Bernhard, 2002. "Mixed motives: an empirical analysis of ILO roll-call votes," ZEW Discussion Papers 02-40, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Wegehenkel Lothar & Walterscheid Heike, 2008. "Rechtsstruktur und Evolution von Wirtschaftssystemen – Pfadabhängigkeit in Richtung Zentralisierung? / The Structure of Property Rights and the Evolution of Economic Systems – Path Independences leadi," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 59(1), pages 313-342, January.
    18. Roland Vaubel, 1996. "The constitutional future of the European Union," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 317-324, December.
    19. Libman, A., 2010. "Empirical Research on Determinants of Decentralization: A Literature Survey," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 6, pages 10-29.
    20. Lars P. Feld & Wolfgang Kerber, 2006. "Mehr-Ebenen Jurisdiktionssysteme: Zur variablen Architektur von Integration," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200605, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:51:y:2000:i:1:p:383-404:n:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.