IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v17y2021i1p57-66n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A contextual analysis of crossing the ball in soccer

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Lucas Y.
  • Danielson Aaron J.
  • Hu X. Joan
  • Swartz Tim B.

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A1S6, British Columbia, Canada)

Abstract

The action of crossing the ball in soccer has a long history as an effective tactic for producing goals. Lately, the benefit of crossing the ball has come under question, and alternative strategies have been suggested. This paper utilizes player tracking data to explore crossing at a deeper level. First, we investigate the spatio-temporal conditions that lead to crossing. Then we introduce an intended target model that investigates crossing success. Finally, a contextual analysis is provided that assesses the benefits of crossing in various situations. The analysis is based on causal inference techniques and suggests that crossing remains an effective tactic in particular contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Lucas Y. & Danielson Aaron J. & Hu X. Joan & Swartz Tim B., 2021. "A contextual analysis of crossing the ball in soccer," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 57-66, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:57-66:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2020-0060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2020-0060
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2020-0060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarkar Sumit, 2018. "Paradox of crosses in association football (soccer) – a game-theoretic explanation," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 25-36, March.
    2. King, Gary & Nielsen, Richard, 2019. "Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 435-454, October.
    3. Bransen Lotte & Van Haaren Jan & van de Velden Michel, 2019. "Measuring soccer players’ contributions to chance creation by valuing their passes," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 97-116, June.
    4. Łukasz Szczepański & Ian McHale, 2016. "Beyond completion rate: evaluating the passing ability of footballers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(2), pages 513-533, February.
    5. Guido W. Imbens, 2004. "Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(1), pages 4-29, February.
    6. Bransen Lotte & Van Haaren Jan & van de Velden Michel, 2019. "Measuring soccer players’ contributions to chance creation by valuing their passes," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 97-116, June.
    7. Oberstone Joel, 2009. "Differentiating the Top English Premier League Football Clubs from the Rest of the Pack: Identifying the Keys to Success," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Sekhon, Jasjeet S., 2011. "Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching package for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i07).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralf Becker & Maggy Fostier, 2015. "Evaluating non-compulsory educational interventions - the case of peer assisted study groups," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1509, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    2. Florian Gunsilius & Yuliang Xu, 2021. "Matching for causal effects via multimarginal unbalanced optimal transport," Papers 2112.04398, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    3. Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Bhuiyan & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2022. "Impact of Farmer Field School on Crop Income, Agroecology, and Farmer’s Behavior in Farming: A Case Study on Cumilla District in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Xueli Wang & Yen Lee & Xiwei Zhu & Ayse Okur Ozdemir, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship Between Community College Students’ Exposure to Math Contextualization and Educational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(2), pages 309-336, March.
    5. Frölich, Markus & Huber, Martin & Wiesenfarth, Manuel, 2017. "The finite sample performance of semi- and non-parametric estimators for treatment effects and policy evaluation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 91-102.
    6. Massimo Baldini & Daniele Pacifico & Federica Termini, 2015. "Imputation of missing expenditure information in standard household income surveys," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0116, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    7. Wendimu, Mengistu Assefa & Henningsen, Arne & Gibbon, Peter, 2016. "Sugarcane Outgrowers in Ethiopia: “Forced” to Remain Poor?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 84-97.
    8. Dudel Christian & Garbuszus Jan Marvin & Ott Notburga & Werding Martin, 2017. "Matching as Non-Parametric Preprocessing for the Estimation of Equivalence Scales," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 237(2), pages 115-141, April.
    9. Pauline Leung & Zhuan Pei,, 2020. "Further Education During Unemployment," Working Papers 642, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    10. Luke Keele & Stephen O’Neill & Richard Grieve, 2021. "Comparing the Performance of Statistical Adjustment Methods by Recovering the Experimental Benchmark from the REFLUX Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(3), pages 340-353, April.
    11. Jianmei ZHAO & Hai ZHONG, 2019. "A Demographic Factor as a Determinant of Migration: What Is the Effect of Sibship Size on Migration Decision?," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(4), pages 321-345, December.
    12. Gregory N. Price & Chris W. Surprenant, 2022. "The Treatment Effect of Business Education on the Supply of High School Entrepreneurs in Atlanta and New Orleans," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 67(1), pages 85-98, March.
    13. Gary King & Christopher Lucas & Richard A. Nielsen, 2017. "The Balance‐Sample Size Frontier in Matching Methods for Causal Inference," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 473-489, April.
    14. Seonho Shin, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of the Matching Grant Program for Refugees: An Observational Study Using Matching, Weighting, and the Mantel-Haenszel Test," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 103-133, March.
    15. Avila-Cano, Antonio & Owen, P. Dorian & Triguero-Ruiz, Francisco, 2023. "Measuring competitive balance in sports leagues that award bonus points, with an application to rugby union," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 939-952.
    16. Dridi, Ichrak & Boughrara, Adel, 2023. "Flexible inflation targeting and stock market volatility: Evidence from emerging market economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Khorana, Sangeeta & Webster, Allan, 2023. "Too few women at the top of firms: Foreign ownership, gender segregation and cultural causes," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1276, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Alberto Caron & Gianluca Baio & Ioanna Manolopoulou, 2022. "Estimating individual treatment effects using non‐parametric regression models: A review," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 1115-1149, July.
    19. Chen, Bowen & Gramig, Ben & Yun, Seong Do, 2020. "A Causal Analysis of the Effect of Conservation Tillage on U.S. Corn and Soybean Yield and Profitability," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304296, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Shu Yang & Yunshu Zhang, 2023. "Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 50(1), pages 235-265, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:57-66:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.