IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v25y2016i1-2p57-79n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Bewertung der Arbeitszufriedenheit: Eine standardisierte Methode zur Befragung behinderter und nicht-behinderter Beschäftigter

Author

Listed:
  • Pfaff Simon

    (Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung, Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 4, 65185 Wiesbaden, Germany)

  • Kuhn Marc

    (Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg, Paulinenstr. 50, 70178 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Eine hohe Arbeitszufriedenheit hat – unabhängig vom Grad der Behinderung – nicht nur einen positiven Einfluss auf die Lebensqualität der Beschäftigten, sondern auch eine hohe Bedeutung für den Arbeitgeber. Trotzdem finden sich in der standardisierten Umfrageforschung kaum Arbeiten, die sich systematisch der Zufriedenheit behinderter und nicht-behinderter Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer widmen. In diesem Beitrag zur Methodenentwicklung und Methodendiskussion entwickeln wir basierend auf verfügbaren Messinstrumenten einen Vorschlag zur Messung der allgemeinen Arbeitszufrie-denheit. Auf der Grundlage einer Befragung in Integrationsfirmen in Baden-Württemberg prüfen wir Aspekte der Reliabilität und Validität des Erhebungsinstruments. Dabei stellen wir fest, dass die resultierende Datenqualität als zufriedenstellend angesehen werden kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Pfaff Simon & Kuhn Marc, 2016. "Die Bewertung der Arbeitszufriedenheit: Eine standardisierte Methode zur Befragung behinderter und nicht-behinderter Beschäftigter," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1-2), pages 57-79, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:57-79:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2016-0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2016-0025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2016-0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Fietze, 2011. "Arbeitszufriedenheit und Persönlichkeit: "Wer schaffen will, muss fröhlich sein!"," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 388, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Dominik Hanglberger, 2010. "Arbeitszufriedenheit und flexible Arbeitszeiten – Empirische Analyse mit Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels," FFB-Discussionpaper 80, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mandy Schult & Verena Tobsch, 2012. "Freizeitstress: wenn die Arbeit ständig ruft," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 485, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Wunder, Christoph, 2016. "Working hours mismatch and well-being: comparative evidence from Australian and German panel data," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145544, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Beckmann, Fabian, 2020. "Perceived Job Quality in German Minijobs. A Multidimensional Analysis of Work in Marginal Part-time Employment RelationshipsDate submitted: August 23, 2018Revised version accepted after double-blind r," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 31(2), pages 116-144.
    4. Joachim Merz & Henning Stolze, 2010. "Kumulation von Querschnitten - Evaluierung alternativer Konzepte für die kumulierten laufenden Wirtschaftsrechnungen 1999 bis 2003 im Vergleich zur Einkommens- und Verbrauchsstichprobe 2003," FFB-Discussionpaper 85, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    5. Sarah Holly & Alwine Mohnen, 2012. "Impact of Working Hours on Work-Life Balance," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 465, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Bellmann, Lutz & Hübler, Olaf & Leber, Ute, 2018. "Works Councils, Training and Employee Satisfaction," IZA Discussion Papers 11871, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Beckmann, Michael & Hegedüs, Istvan, 2011. "Trust-based working time and organizational performance: evidence from German establishment-level panel data," Working papers 2011/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    8. Wanger, Susanne, 2017. "What makes employees satisfied with their working time? : The role of working hours, time-sovereignty and working conditions for working time and job satisfaction," IAB-Discussion Paper 201720, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    9. Spieß, Katharina & Stock, Johanna, 2016. "Fachkräfte in der frühen Bildung - Erwerbssituation, Einstellungen und Änderungswünsche. Eine Analyse auf Basis des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) und Familien in Deutschland (FiD)," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 009, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    10. Sobia Shujat & Farooq-E-Azam Cheema & Faryal Bhutto, 2011. "Impact Of Work Life Balance On Employee Job Satisfaction In Private Banking Sector Of Karachi," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 7(2), pages 8-15.
    11. C. Katharina Spieß & Johanna Storck, 2016. "Fachkräfte in der frühen Bildung - Erwerbssituation, Einstellungen und Änderungswünsche," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 852, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Dominik Hanglberger, 2011. "Arbeitszufriedenheit im internationalen Vergleich," FFB-Discussionpaper 86, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    13. Jennifer Hunt, 2013. "Flexible Work Time in Germany: Do Workers Like It and How Have Employers Exploited It Over the Cycle?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 14(1-2), pages 67-98, February.
    14. Ralf Werner Koßmann, 2016. "Effectiveness of Social Capital in the Job Search Process," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 823, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    15. Joachim Merz & Tim Rathjen, 2011. "Zeit- und Einkommensarmut von Freien Berufen und Unternehmern," FFB-Discussionpaper 89, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    16. Brenzel, Hanna & Laible, Marie-Christine, 2016. "Does personality matter? : the impact of the big five on the migrant and gender wage gaps," IAB-Discussion Paper 201626, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    17. Sobia Shujat & Farooq-E-Azam Cheema & Faryal Bhutto, 2011. "Impact Of Work Life Balance On Employee Job Satisfaction In Private Banking Sector Of Karachi," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 7(2), pages 7-2.
    18. Michael Olejniczak & Dirk Salmon & Wenzel Matiaske & Simon Fietze, 2014. "Arbeitsbedingungen in Jobcentern - Gemeinsame Einrichtungen nach § 44b SGB II Mitarbeiterbefragung zum Arbeitsumfeld, psychischer Belastung und Arbeitszufriedenheit," Report 028, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:57-79:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.