IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/aelcon/v7y2017i2p93-103n13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Need to Reform the Dangerous IFRS System of Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Jacques

    (Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC) Committee, Dauphine University of Paris, Paris, France)

Abstract

As a fundamental instrument of financial capitalism the today’s IFRS system of accounting is not only totally unsuitable for the needs of a new ecological world but also represents a serious menace for the development of a sound economic system. The goal of this article is to explain the main reasons for this criticism and to suggest some elements of reconstruction of the today’s accounting system with a new international environmental accounting to be promoted by the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Jacques, 2017. "The Need to Reform the Dangerous IFRS System of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 93-103, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:93-103:n:13
    DOI: 10.1515/ael-2017-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2017-0017
    Download Restriction: Download restriction for institutions: For access to full text, subscription to the journal is required. Individual readers who register with De Gruyter Online get free access.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ael-2017-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/15215 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The dangerous dynamics of modern capitalism (from static to IFRS’ futuristic accounting)," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 9-34.
    3. Kay, John A, 1976. "Accountants, Too, Could Be Happy in a Golden Age: The Accountant's Rate of Profit and the Internal Rate of Return," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 447-460, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2009. "Splitting up value: A critical review of residual income theories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    3. Küpper, Hans-Ulrich & Pedell, Burkhard, 2016. "Which asset valuation and depreciation method should be used for regulated utilities? An analytical and simulation-based comparison," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 88-103.
    4. Thomas Pfeiffer, 2004. "Net Present Value‐Consistent Investment Criteria Based on Accruals: A Generalisation of the Residual Income‐Identity," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7‐8), pages 905-926, September.
    5. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    6. Roberts, John, 2021. "The boundary of the ‘economic’: Financial accounting, corporate ‘imaginaries’ and human sentience," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2004. "Modelling excess profit," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 595-617, May.
    8. Michelle Baddeley, 2006. "Behind the black box: a survey of real-world investment appraisal approaches," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 33(5), pages 329-350, December.
    9. Carlo Alberto Magni & Ken V. Peasnell, 2015. "The Term Structure of Capital Values:An accounting-based framework for measuring economic profitability," Department of Economics 0060, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    10. Michelle Baddeley & Geoff Harcourt, 2021. "A Behavioural Model of Investment Appraisal and its Implications for the Macroeconomy," Working Paper Series 2021/05, Economics Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    11. Feenstra, Dick W. & Huijgen, Carel A. & Wang, Hua, 2000. "An evaluation of the accounting rate of return : evidence for Dutch quoted firms," Research Report 00E55, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:00e42 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Richard P. Brief & Hector R. Anton, 1987. "An index of growth due to depreciation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 394-407, March.
    14. Alexandre RAMBAUD, 2023. "How can accounting reformulate the debate on natural capital and help implement its ecological approach?," Working Paper 8567406c-bed0-4401-9792-a, Agence française de développement.
    15. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2005. "Economic profit, NPV, and CAPM: Biases and violations of Modigliani and Miller's Proposition I," MPRA Paper 7359, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 Feb 2008.
    16. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2009. "Opportunity Cost, Excess Profit, and Counterfactual Conditionals," Frontiers in Finance and Economics, SKEMA Business School, vol. 6(1), pages 118-154, April.
    17. Stephen Keef & Melvin Roush, 2001. "Residual Income: A Review Essay," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 8-14, March.
    18. Paul A. Grout & Anna Zalewska, 2008. "Measuring The Rate Of Return For Competition Law," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 155-176.
    19. Tiago Cardao-Pito & João Silva Ferreira, 2018. "‘Fair Value’ accounting as the normative Fisherian phase of accounting," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 149-179, September.
    20. Gendron, Yves & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2021. "On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    21. Roberts, John & Wang, Timothy, 2019. "Faithful representation as an ‘objective mirage’: A Saussurean analysis of accounting and its participation in the financial crisis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:93-103:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.