IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v71y2019i5p63-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations Regarding The Measurement Of Social Impact Vs The Institution Of Social Entrepreneurship And Conflict Of Interest According To Regulation (Eu) 2019-819

Author

Listed:
  • POPESCU Lavinia

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • SAFTA Adela Sorinela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The article addresses the institution of social entrepreneurship from the perspective of Regulation (EU) no. 346/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2013 on European social entrepreneurship funds, reaffirmed by the importance of the need to supplement Regulation (EU) no. 346/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on conflicts of interest, measuring the social impact and informing the investors in the field of European social entrepreneurship funds. The measures are aimed at protecting the interests of the eligible social entrepreneurship fund or its investors. These measures should include informing the senior management or other competent internal body about the eligible social entrepreneurship fund and making the decisions or taking the necessary actions to act in the interest of the eligible social entrepreneurship fund or its investors. The importance of ensuring the legal certainty of the rights, as well as the obligations of the managers of the entrepreneurship funds and their active role in the management of the companies in which they invest the eligible social entrepreneurship funds are those that we will address in the thematic article in the following.

Suggested Citation

  • POPESCU Lavinia & SAFTA Adela Sorinela, 2019. "Considerations Regarding The Measurement Of Social Impact Vs The Institution Of Social Entrepreneurship And Conflict Of Interest According To Regulation (Eu) 2019-819," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 71(5), pages 63-76, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:71:y:2019:i:5:p:63-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/71506popescu&safta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. anonymous, 2010. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 779-782, 07-08.
    2. anonymous, 2010. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 958-961, 09-10.
    3. Carlos Larrinaga & Francisco Carrasco & Carmen Correa & Fernando Llena & Jose Moneva, 2002. "Accountability and accounting regulation: the case of the Spanish environmental disclosure standard," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 723-740.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niina Sormanen & Epp Lauk, 2016. "Issues of Ethics and Methods in Studying Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 63-65.
    2. Mark Skidmore & Hideki Toya, 2013. "Natural Disaster Impacts and Fiscal Decentralization," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(1), pages 101-117.
    3. Ferri, Giovanni & Murro, Pierluigi & Peruzzi, Valentina & Rotondi, Zeno, 2019. "Bank lending technologies and credit availability in Europe: What can we learn from the crisis?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 128-148.
    4. Lisa Cameron & Manisha Shah, 2015. "Risk-Taking Behavior in the Wake of Natural Disasters," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 484-515.
    5. Olivier J. Blanchard & Mitali Das & Hamid Faruqee, 2010. "The Initial Impact of the Crisis on Emerging Market Countries," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 41(1 (Spring), pages 263-323.
    6. Gómez, O.A., 2013. "Climate change and migration," ISS Working Papers - General Series 50161, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    7. Andrew Burwick & Gary Gates & Scott Baumgartner & Daniel Friend, "undated". "Human Services for Low-Income and At-Risk LGBT Populations: An Assessment of the Knowledge Base and Research Needs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5d6ee2c749e346f2a6fd6d635, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Robert Hockett, 2013. "Paying Paul and robbing no one: an eminent domain solution for underwater mortgage debt," Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 19(Jun).
    9. Andrea Setti, 2020. "Linking science-based firms with performance factors: An integrative systematic review of literature," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 09-42, March.
    10. Diego Aragon & Emanuel Moench & James Vickery, 2010. "Why is the market share of adjustable-rate mortgages so low?," Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 16(Dec).
    11. Patten, Dennis M., 2005. "The accuracy of financial report projections of future environmental capital expenditures: a research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 457-468, July.
    12. Guidry, Ronald P. & Patten, Dennis M., 2012. "Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 81-90.
    13. Michel Coulmont & Sylvie Berthelot & Vincent Gagné, 2022. "Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Ataur Belal & Robin Roberts, 2010. "Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 311-324, December.
    15. Valentina Marano & Peter Tashman & Tatiana Kostova, 2017. "Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(3), pages 386-408, April.
    16. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Carlo Marcon & Silvia Panfilo, 2020. "The predictive ability of legitimacy and agency theory after the implementation of the EU directive on non‐financial information," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2465-2476, November.
    17. Fernando Llena & Jose M. Moneva & Blanca Hernandez, 2007. "Environmental disclosures and compulsory accounting standards: the case of spanish annual reports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 50-63, January.
    18. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga & Jose M. Moneva, 2008. "Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 337-361, March.
    19. Julia Bettina Leicht & Maximilian Leicht, 2022. "Changes in the climate-related disclosure of German listed companies during the first years of the new reporting standard," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Esther Ortiz‐Martínez & Salvador Marín‐Hernández & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2023. "How does the European Green Deal affect the disclosure of environmental information?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2766-2782, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social Entrepreneurship; Eligible; Active; Conflict of Interest;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:71:y:2019:i:5:p:63-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.