IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v16y1995i3p241-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on international market leaders and networks of strategic technology partnering

Author

Listed:
  • John Hagedoorn

Abstract

Interfirm partnering has become a familiar aspect of corporate behavior as it is found in a large number of industries with many Companies participating in strategic alliances. This paper focuses on questions that are related to market structural issues of this phenomenon in an international context. It raises the question whether alliances establish stable networks of firms, and whether market leading firms dominate the world of strategic partnering. Our contribution stresses the need for a further understanding of cooperative behavior in terms of the increase of corporate flexibility and the extension of core competences of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hagedoorn, 1995. "A note on international market leaders and networks of strategic technology partnering," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 241-250.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:16:y:1995:i:3:p:241-250
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250160307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.4250160307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masao Nakamura & John Hagedoorn & Hans van Kranenburg & Richard N. Osborn, 2003. "Joint patenting amongst companies - exploring the effects of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2-3), pages 71-84.
    2. Sakakibara, Mariko, 1997. "Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 447-473, December.
    3. M. Bensaou & Erin Anderson, 1999. "Buyer-Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Risk Making Idiosyncratic Investments?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 460-481, August.
    4. Aaquib Islam & Weizi Li & Kevin Johnson & Priam Lauchande, 0. "How far has the integrated care come? Applying an asymmetric lens to inter-organisation trust amongst health and social care organisations," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    5. Hagedoorn, John, 2000. "External Appropriation of Innovative Capabilities: The Preference for Strategic Alliances or M&AS," Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Barney, Jay B. & Busenitz, Lowell W. & Fiet, James O. & Moesel, Douglas D., 1996. "New venture teams' assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 257-272, July.
    7. Sarianna Lundan & John Hagedoorn, 2001. "Alliances, Acquisitions and Multinational Advantage," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 229-242.
    8. Catherine Tucker, 2011. "Network Stability, Network Externalities and Technology Adoption," NBER Working Papers 17246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Aaquib Islam & Weizi Li & Kevin Johnson & Priam Lauchande, 2020. "How far has the integrated care come? Applying an asymmetric lens to inter-organisation trust amongst health and social care organisations," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 529-554, June.
    10. Duysters, Geert & Hagedoorn, John, 1996. "The effect of core competence building on companies performance," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Hagedoorn, John & Sadowski, Bert, 1995. "Exploring the potential transition from strategic technology partnering to mergers and acquisitions," Research Memorandum 012, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Bertschek, Irene & Ohnemus, Jörg & Erdsiek, Daniel & Hogrefe, Jan & Kimpeler, Simone & Rammer, Christian & Schreiber, Nina & Shala, Erduana & Wagner, Simona Christine, 2013. "Monitoring zu ausgewählten wirtschaftlichen Eckdaten der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2013: Bericht im Rahmen des Projekts "Stand und Perspektiven der deutschen Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 201," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 175320.
    13. Africa Ariño & José de la Torre, 1998. "Learning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 306-325, June.
    14. Hao, Bin & Feng, Yanan & Ye, Jiangfeng, 2017. "Building interfirm leadership: A relational identity perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 651-662.
    15. Busenitz, Lowell W. & Fiet, James O. & Moesel, Douglas D., 2004. "Reconsidering the venture capitalists' "value added" proposition: An interorganizational learning perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 787-807, November.
    16. Ariño, Africa & Torre, Jose de la & Doz, Yves & Ring, Peter S. & Lorenzoni, Gianni, 1999. "Process issues in alliance management: A panel discussion," IESE Research Papers D/403, IESE Business School.
    17. Cevikarslan S., 2015. "Research joint ventures in an R&D driven market with evolving consumer preferences: An evolutionary multi-agent based modelling approach," MERIT Working Papers 2015-007, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Hagedoorn, John & Sedaitis, Judith B., 1998. "Partnerships in transition economies: international strategic technology alliances in Russia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 177-185, June.
    19. Roijakkers, Nadine & Hagedoorn, John & van Kranenburg, Hans, 2005. "Dual market structures and the likelihood of repeated ties - evidence from pharmaceutical biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 235-245, March.
    20. Santangelo, Grazia D., 2000. "Corporate strategic technological partnerships in the European information and communications technology industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1015-1031, December.
    21. Todd R. Zenger & Sergio G. Lazzarini, 2004. "Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6-7), pages 329-345.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:16:y:1995:i:3:p:241-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.