IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v76y2022i1p97-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying crime generators and spatially overlapping high‐risk areas through a nonlinear model: A comparison between three cities of the Valencian region (Spain)

Author

Listed:
  • Álvaro Briz‐Redón
  • Jorge Mateu
  • Francisco Montes

Abstract

The behavior and spatial distribution of crime events can be explained through the characterization of an area in terms of its demography, socioeconomy, and built environment. In particular, recent studies on the incidence of crime in a city have focused on the identification of features of the built environment (specific places or facilities) that may increase crime risk within a certain radius. However, it is hard to identify environmental characteristics that consistently explain crime occurrence across cities and crime types. This article focuses on the assessment of the effect that certain types of places have on the incidence of property crime, robbery, and vandalism in three cities of the Valencian region (Spain): Alicante, Castellon, and Valencia. A nonlinear effects model is used to identify such places and to construct a risk map over the three cities considering the three crime types under research. The results obtained suggest that there are remarkable differences across cities and crime types in terms of the types of places associated with crime outcomes. The identification of high‐risk areas allows verifying that crime is highly concentrated, and also that there is a high level of spatial overlap between the high‐risk areas corresponding to different crime types.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvaro Briz‐Redón & Jorge Mateu & Francisco Montes, 2022. "Identifying crime generators and spatially overlapping high‐risk areas through a nonlinear model: A comparison between three cities of the Valencian region (Spain)," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(1), pages 97-120, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:76:y:2022:i:1:p:97-120
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Rodrigues & Peter Diggle & Renato Assuncao, 2010. "Semiparametric approach to point source modelling in epidemiology and criminology," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 533-542, May.
    2. Håvard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392, April.
    3. Peter J. Diggle, 1990. "A Point Process Modelling Approach to Raised Incidence of a Rare Phenomenon in the Vicinity of a Prespecified Point," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 153(3), pages 349-362, May.
    4. Valasik, Matthew, 2018. "Gang violence predictability: Using risk terrain modeling to study gang homicides and gang assaults in East Los Angeles," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 10-21.
    5. Lindgren, Finn & Rue, Håvard, 2015. "Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i19).
    6. Peter Diggle & Sara Morris & Paul Elliott & Gavin Shaddick, 1997. "Regression Modelling of Disease Risk in Relation to Point Sources," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 160(3), pages 491-505, September.
    7. Bivand, Roger & Piras, Gianfranco, 2015. "Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i18).
    8. Connealy, Nathan T. & Piza, Eric L., 2019. "Risk factor and high-risk place variations across different robbery targets in Denver, Colorado," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 47-56.
    9. Malleson, Nick & Andresen, Martin A., 2016. "Exploring the impact of ambient population measures on London crime hotspots," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 52-63.
    10. Julian Besag & Jeremy York & Annie Mollié, 1991. "Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wuxue Cheng & Yajun Rao & Yixin Tang & Jiajia Yang & Yuxin Chen & Li Peng & Jiangcheng Hao, 2022. "Identifying the Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Crime in Liangshan Prefecture, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, Blair T. & Sisti, Anthony & Bernstein, Mary & Chen, Kun & Hennessy, Emily A. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L. & Matos, Michaela, 2021. "Community-level factors and incidence of gun violence in the United States, 2014–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    2. William Gonzalez Daza & Renata L. Muylaert & Thadeu Sobral-Souza & Victor Lemes Landeiro, 2023. "Malaria Risk Drivers in the Brazilian Amazon: Land Use—Land Cover Interactions and Biological Diversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-16, August.
    3. John M. Humphreys, 2022. "Amplification in Time and Dilution in Space: Partitioning Spatiotemporal Processes to Assess the Role of Avian-Host Phylodiversity in Shaping Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus Distribution," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Humphreys, John M. & Srygley, Robert B. & Lawton, Douglas & Hudson, Amy R. & Branson, David H., 2022. "Grasshoppers exhibit asynchrony and spatial non-stationarity in response to the El Niño/Southern and Pacific Decadal Oscillations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    5. Chien-Chou Chen & Guo-Jun Lo & Ta-Chien Chan, 2022. "Spatial Analysis on Supply and Demand of Adult Surgical Masks in Taipei Metropolitan Areas in the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Yang, Anni & Liu, Chenhui & Yang, Di & Lu, Chaoru, 2023. "Electric vehicle adoption in a mature market: A case study of Norway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Thomas Suesse, 2018. "Estimation of spatial autoregressive models with measurement error for large data sets," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1627-1648, December.
    8. Ropo E. Ogunsakin & Themba G. Ginindza, 2022. "Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Diabetes and Hypertension: Results from the South Africa General Household Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Chen, Yewen & Chang, Xiaohui & Luo, Fangzhi & Huang, Hui, 2023. "Additive dynamic models for correcting numerical model outputs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Jamie M. Madden & Simon More & Conor Teljeur & Justin Gleeson & Cathal Walsh & Guy McGrath, 2021. "Population Mobility Trends, Deprivation Index and the Spatio-Temporal Spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Mabel Morales-Otero & Vicente Núñez-Antón, 2021. "Comparing Bayesian Spatial Conditional Overdispersion and the Besag–York–Mollié Models: Application to Infant Mortality Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, January.
    12. Hossain, Md. Monir & Lawson, Andrew B., 2009. "Approximate methods in Bayesian point process spatial models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2831-2842, June.
    13. Jinjie Chen & Joon Jin Song & James D. Stamey, 2022. "A Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Model to Correct for Misreporting in Count Data: Application to State-Level COVID-19 Data in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Daqian Liu & Wei Song & Chunliang Xiu & Jun Xu, 2021. "Understanding the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Crimes in Changchun, China: A Bayesian Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Nicholas J Tierney & Antonietta Mira & H Jost Reinhold & Giuseppe Arbia & Samuel Clifford & Angelo Auricchio & Tiziano Moccetti & Stefano Peluso & Kerrie L Mengersen, 2019. "Evaluating health facility access using Bayesian spatial models and location analysis methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Wang, Craig & Furrer, Reinhard, 2021. "Combining heterogeneous spatial datasets with process-based spatial fusion models: A unifying framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Márcio Poletti Laurini, 2017. "A continuous spatio-temporal model for house prices in the USA," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 235-269, January.
    18. Cho, Daegon & Hwang, Youngdeok & Park, Jongwon, 2018. "More buzz, more vibes: Impact of social media on concert distribution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 103-113.
    19. Alexandre Rodrigues & Peter Diggle & Renato Assuncao, 2010. "Semiparametric approach to point source modelling in epidemiology and criminology," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 533-542, May.
    20. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:76:y:2022:i:1:p:97-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.