IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v5y2001i2p169-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Growth Encourage Factor Price Equalization?

Author

Listed:
  • Alan V. Deardorff

Abstract

This paper first notes the importance of “one‐cone” versus “multi‐cone” equilibria in the Heckscher–Ohlin model of international trade, then asks whether economic growth in neoclassical growth models leads toward one or the other. The one‐cone equilibrium arises with internationally similar factor endowments. It has a single set (cone) of relative factor endowments, within which countries diversify and have global factor price equalization (FPE) under free trade. The multi‐cone equilibrium arises with larger factor endowment differences. It has FPE within cones, but not between them. The two configurations differ in important ways. The paper examines several neoclassical trade‐and‐growth models, distinguished by their assumptions about saving, asking whether factor endowments converge into a single cone. None of the models suggests convergence, while some strongly imply that countries will end up in different cones. This suggests a preference for the multi‐cone version of the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan V. Deardorff, 2001. "Does Growth Encourage Factor Price Equalization?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 169-181, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:5:y:2001:i:2:p:169-181
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00116
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9361.00116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barua, Alokesh & Pant, Manoj, 2014. "Trade and wage inequality: A specific factor model with intermediate goods," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 172-185.
    2. Alan Deardorff, 2001. "Developing country growth and developed country response," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 373-392.
    3. Jin, Yi & Zeng, Zhixiong, 2007. "International Growth Equalization along nonbalanced constant growth paths," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 245-252, August.
    4. Kozo Kiyota, 2014. "Industrial Upgrading in a Multiple-cone Heckscher–Ohlin Model: The Flying Geese Patterns of Industrial Development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 177-193, February.
    5. Xiang, Chong, 2007. "New goods and the skill premium," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 133-147, March.
    6. An‐Chi Tung, 2003. "Beyond Flying Geese: The Expansion of East Asia's Electronics Trade," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 35-51, February.
    7. Becker, Daniel Thomas & Gundlach, Erich, 2006. "Notes on factor price equality and biased technical change in a two-cone trade model," Kiel Working Papers 1300, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Debaere, Peter & Demiroglu, Ufuk, 2003. "On the similarity of country endowments," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 101-136, January.
    9. Daniel Becker & Erich Gundlach, 2005. "Notes on Factor Price Equality and Biased Technological Change in a Two-Cone Trade Model," DEGIT Conference Papers c010_006, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    10. Alokesh Baura & Priyanta Ghosh, 2015. "On Wage Inequality, Trade and Technology: Theory and Empirics," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 15-09, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    11. Gundlach, Erich & de Vaal, Albert, 2012. "Technology differences in empirical studies of international trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 18-20.
    12. Lionel Fontagné & Michaël Pajot & Jean-Michel Pasteels, 2002. "Potentiels de commerce entre économies hétérogènes : un petit mode d'emploi des modèles de gravité," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(1), pages 115-139.
    13. Lorenzo Rotunno & Adrian Wood, 2015. "Wages and endowments in a globalised world," Economics Papers 2015-W11, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    14. Xu, Yun & Ouyang, Alice Y., 2017. "Tariffs, relative prices and wage inequality: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 97-109.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:5:y:2001:i:2:p:169-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.