IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/obuest/v62y2000i5p607-619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Productivity Impact of IT Deployment: An Empirical Evaluation of ATM Introduction

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Haynes
  • Steve Thompson

Abstract

The term ‘IT paradox’ has been widely used to describe the apparent failure of much economic research to discover significant productivity gains associated with IT investment. In part this has been ascribed to measurement problems associated with both IT inputs and with outputs in IT‐intensive industries. The current paper seeks to circumvent these difficulties by taking the ATM as a clearly defined embodied IT application and then using anaugmented production function approach to isolate its productivity effectsacross a sample of UK building societies, over the period of the ATM’sdiffusion. The paper finds no support for the ‘IT paradox’ and reports large robust and statistically significant productivity gains associated with ATM introduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Haynes & Steve Thompson, 2000. "The Productivity Impact of IT Deployment: An Empirical Evaluation of ATM Introduction," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 62(5), pages 607-619, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:62:y:2000:i:5:p:607-619
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0084.00192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00192
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0084.00192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolae Carmen, 2007. "Budgetary Implications When Using Electronic Transactions In The Romanian Public Sector," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(9), pages 1-15.
    2. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Patel, Pankaj C. & Gebauer, Heiko, 2020. "The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Scott, Susan V. & Van Reenen, John & Zachariadis, Markos, 2017. "The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 984-1004.
    4. G. Ardizzi & F. Crudu & C. Petraglia, 2015. "The Impact of Electronic Payments on Bank Cost Efficiency: Nonparametric Evidence," Working Paper CRENoS 201517, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    5. Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Gómez, Jaime & Palomas, Sergio, 2009. "The effects of new technologies on productivity: An intrafirm diffusion-based assessment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1172-1180, September.
    6. Bernad, Cristina & Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Gómez, Jaime, 2010. "The effect of mergers and acquisitions on productivity: An empirical application to Spanish banking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 283-293, October.
    7. Doina Caragea & Theodor Cojoianu & Mihai Dobri & Andreas Hoepner & Oana Peia & Davide Romelli, 2024. "Competition and Innovation in the Financial Sector: Evidence from the Rise of FinTech Start-ups," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 65(1), pages 103-140, February.
    8. Kamalpreet Kaur & Mandeep Kaur, 2020. "Determinants of Diffusion and Adoption of ATM cum Debit Cards in Indian Banking Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(5), pages 1263-1278, October.
    9. Byoung-Min Kim & Richard Widdows & Tansel Yilmazer, 2005. "The determinants of consumers’ adoption of Internet banking," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:62:y:2000:i:5:p:607-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.