IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v54y2001i4p509-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutions of Conflict Management and Economic Growth in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrich Schneider
  • Alexander F. Wagner

Abstract

High‐quality institutions of conflict management can serve to mitigate the negative effects of adverse external shocks and social conflict on long‐run economic growth. But in addition to the benefits (production‐enhancing cooperation), there are also costs (taxes and rent‐seeking) of conflict‐management institutions like corporatism and trust. We examine both positive and negative influences in the context of a simple growth model. Contrary to previous research, we predict a non‐linear relationship between institutions and growth. The empirical evidence from a panel for the years 1961‐1995 shows that neo‐corporatism and trust have each had independent positive effects on long‐run growth in the EU, suggesting that the diminishing product range of institutions has not yet been reached. Under an increasing size of government, however, both institutions lead to a dominating negative rent‐seeking effect. Our thanks for helpful comments go to the editors, an anonymous referee, Karl Aiginger, Mathias Dufour, Frauke Skudelny, Robert Urbatsch, seminar participants at the University of Linz, the Austrian Institute for Economic Research and discussants at the European Public Choice Society Meeting 2000 in Siena. All remaining errors are ours, of course. An extended version of this paper is available from the authors on request (Schneider and Wagner 2001). Further results are discussed in Wagner (2000).

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrich Schneider & Alexander F. Wagner, 2001. "Institutions of Conflict Management and Economic Growth in the European Union," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 509-531, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:54:y:2001:i:4:p:509-531
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6435.00167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00167
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6435.00167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:wvu:wpaper:09-05 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Slesman, Ly & Baharumshah, Ahmad Zubaidi & Ra'ees, Wahabuddin, 2015. "Institutional infrastructure and economic growth in member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 214-226.
    3. Czyżewski, Bazyli & Matuszczak, Anna, 2018. "Rent-seeking in agricultural policy revisited: a new look at the Common Agricultural Policy consensus," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(2), August.
    4. Friedrich Schneider & Alexander F. Wagner & Mathias Dufour, 2003. "Satisfaction not guaranteed-Institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe," Economics working papers 2003-03, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    5. Friedrich Schneider & Stefan Haigner & Stefan Jenewein & Florian Wakolbinger, 2014. "Institutions of conflict management and economic growth revisited: a short note," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(3), pages 577-587, August.
    6. Saakshi Jha & Sunny Bhushan & Nupur Nirola, 2024. "Is geopolitical risk always detrimental to economic growth?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Wagner, Alexander F. & Schneider, Friedrich & Halla, Martin, 2009. "The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe -- A panel analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 30-41, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:54:y:2001:i:4:p:509-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.