IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v71y2009i1p75-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing in semiparametric models with interaction, with applications to gene–environment interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Arnab Maity
  • Raymond J. Carroll
  • Enno Mammen
  • Nilanjan Chatterjee

Abstract

Summary. Motivated from the problem of testing for genetic effects on complex traits in the presence of gene–environment interaction, we develop score tests in general semiparametric regression problems that involves Tukey style 1 degree‐of‐freedom form of interaction between parametrically and non‐parametrically modelled covariates. We find that the score test in this type of model, as recently developed by Chatterjee and co‐workers in the fully parametric setting, is biased and requires undersmoothing to be valid in the presence of non‐parametric components. Moreover, in the presence of repeated outcomes, the asymptotic distribution of the score test depends on the estimation of functions which are defined as solutions of integral equations, making implementation difficult and computationally taxing. We develop profiled score statistics which are unbiased and asymptotically efficient and can be performed by using standard bandwidth selection methods. In addition, to overcome the difficulty of solving functional equations, we give easy interpretations of the target functions, which in turn allow us to develop estimation procedures that can be easily implemented by using standard computational methods. We present simulation studies to evaluate type I error and power of the method proposed compared with a naive test that does not consider interaction. Finally, we illustrate our methodology by analysing data from a case–control study of colorectal adenoma that was designed to investigate the association between colorectal adenoma and the candidate gene NAT2 in relation to smoking history.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnab Maity & Raymond J. Carroll & Enno Mammen & Nilanjan Chatterjee, 2009. "Testing in semiparametric models with interaction, with applications to gene–environment interactions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 75-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:1:p:75-96
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00671.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00671.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00671.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xihong Lin, 2004. "Equivalent kernels of smoothing splines in nonparametric regression for clustered/longitudinal data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(1), pages 177-193, March.
    2. Richard Huggins, 2006. "Understanding nonparametric estimation for clustered data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(2), pages 486-489, June.
    3. Naisyin Wang, 2003. "Marginal nonparametric kernel regression accounting for within-subject correlation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 43-52, March.
    4. Horowitz, Joel L & Spokoiny, Vladimir G, 2001. "An Adaptive, Rate-Optimal Test of a Parametric Mean-Regression Model against a Nonparametric Alternative," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 599-631, May.
    5. Xihong Lin & Raymond J. Carroll, 2006. "Semiparametric estimation in general repeated measures problems," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(1), pages 69-88, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin O. Wu & Gang Zheng & Minjung Kwak, 2013. "A Joint Regression Analysis for Genetic Association Studies with Outcome Stratified Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 417-426, June.
    2. Wu Cen & Zhong Ping-Shou & Cui Yuehua, 2018. "Additive varying-coefficient model for nonlinear gene-environment interactions," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    4. Ryan Sun & Raymond J. Carroll & David C. Christiani & Xihong Lin, 2018. "Testing for gene–environment interaction under exposure misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 653-662, June.
    5. Hristina Pashova & Michael LeBlanc & Charles Kooperberg, 2017. "Structured Detection of Interactions with the Directed Lasso," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(2), pages 676-691, December.
    6. Wei, Jiawei & Carroll, Raymond J. & Maity, Arnab, 2011. "Testing for constant nonparametric effects in general semiparametric regression models with interactions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 717-723, July.
    7. Tyler J. VanderWeele & Yu Chen & Habibul Ahsan, 2011. "Inference for Causal Interactions for Continuous Exposures under Dichotomization," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1414-1421, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamadi, Malika & Heinen, Andréas, 2015. "Firm performance when ownership is very concentrated: Evidence from a semiparametric panel," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 172-194.
    2. Li, Cong & Liang, Zhongwen, 2015. "Asymptotics for nonparametric and semiparametric fixed effects panel models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 420-434.
    3. Henderson, Daniel J. & Carroll, Raymond J. & Li, Qi, 2008. "Nonparametric estimation and testing of fixed effects panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 257-275, May.
    4. Ma, Shujie & Liang, Hua & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 2014. "Partially linear single index models for repeated measurements," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 354-375.
    5. Al Kadiri, M. & Carroll, R.J. & Wand, M.P., 2010. "Marginal longitudinal semiparametric regression via penalized splines," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(15-16), pages 1242-1252, August.
    6. Liugen Xue, 2010. "Empirical Likelihood Local Polynomial Regression Analysis of Clustered Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(4), pages 644-663, December.
    7. Zhang, Junhua & Feng, Sanying & Li, Gaorong & Lian, Heng, 2011. "Empirical likelihood inference for partially linear panel data models with fixed effects," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 165-167.
    8. Gholamreza Hajargasht, 2009. "Nonparametric Panel Data Models, A Penalized Spline Approach," CEPA Working Papers Series WP052009, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    9. Daniel J. Henderson, 2010. "A test for multimodality of regression derivatives with application to nonparametric growth regressions," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 458-480.
    10. González Manteiga, Wenceslao & Lombardía, María José & Martínez Miranda, María Dolores & Sperlich, Stefan, 2013. "Kernel smoothers and bootstrapping for semiparametric mixed effects models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 288-302.
    11. Robert L. Paige & Shan Sun & Keyi Wang, 2009. "Variance Reduction in Smoothing Splines," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(1), pages 112-126, March.
    12. Jun Yan & Jian Huang, 2009. "Partly Functional Temporal Process Regression with Semiparametric Profile Estimating Functions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 431-440, June.
    13. Charnigo, Richard & Feng, Limin & Srinivasan, Cidambi, 2015. "Nonparametric and semiparametric compound estimation in multiple covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 179-196.
    14. You, Jinhong & Zhou, Haibo, 2007. "Two-stage efficient estimation of longitudinal nonparametric additive models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(17), pages 1666-1675, November.
    15. Lena Boneva (Körber) & Oliver Linton & Michael Vogt, 2013. "A semiparametric model for heterogeneous panel data with fixed effects," CeMMAP working papers 02/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. R. L. Eubank & Chunfeng Huang & Y. Muñoz Maldonado & Naisyin Wang & Suojin Wang & R. J. Buchanan, 2004. "Smoothing spline estimation in varying‐coefficient models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 653-667, August.
    17. Boneva, Lena & Linton, Oliver & Vogt, Michael, 2015. "A semiparametric model for heterogeneous panel data with fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 327-345.
    18. Annie Qu & Runze Li, 2006. "Quadratic Inference Functions for Varying-Coefficient Models with Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 379-391, June.
    19. Qi Li & Jeffrey Scott Racine, 2006. "Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 8355.
    20. Jeffrey Racine, 2008. "Nonparametric econometrics: a primer (in Russian)," Quantile, Quantile, issue 4, pages 7-56, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:1:p:75-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.