IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/joares/v38y2000i1p209-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The incremental information content of SAS No. 59 going-concern opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Holder-Webb, LM
  • Wilkins, MS

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Holder-Webb, LM & Wilkins, MS, 2000. "The incremental information content of SAS No. 59 going-concern opinions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 209-219.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:38:y:2000:i:1:p:209-219
    DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2672929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2672929.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2672929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoqiang Zhi & Zuming Kang, 2021. "Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Linda A. Myers & Jonathan E. Shipman & Quinn T. Swanquist & Robert L. Whited, 2018. "Measuring the market response to going concern modifications: the importance of disclosure timing," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1512-1542, December.
    3. Jonathan Stanley & F. Todd De Zoort & Gary Taylor, 2009. "The association between insider trading surrounding going concern audit opinions and future bankruptcy," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(3), pages 290-312, March.
    4. Klaus Ruhnke, 2003. "Nutzen von Abschlussprüfungen: Bezugsrahmen und Einordnung empirischer Studien," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 250-280, May.
    5. Carlo Caserio & Delio Panaro & Sara Trucco, 2014. "A statistical analysis of reliability of audit opinions as bankruptcy predictors," Discussion Papers 2014/174, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    6. Liang Tan & Santhosh Ramalingegowda & Yong Yu, 2022. "Third-Party Consequences of Changes in Managerial Fiduciary Duties: The Case of Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1556-1572, February.
    7. Dong, Bei & Robinson, Dahlia & Robinson, Michael, 2015. "The market's response to earnings surprises after first-time going-concern modifications," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 21-32.
    8. Maria-Lenuţa Ciupac-Ulici & Daniela-Georgeta Beju & Ioan-Alin Nistor & Flaviu Pișcoran, 2023. "The impact of the Altman score on the energy sector companies," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 8(Special-J), pages 45-56, June.
    9. Ang, James & Mauck, Nathan, 2011. "Fire sale acquisitions: Myth vs. reality," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 532-543, March.
    10. Kaplan, Steven E. & Williams, David D., 2012. "The changing relationship between audit firm size and going concern reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 322-341.
    11. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:135-151 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Pei, Donglin & Hamill, Philip A., 2013. "Do modified audit opinions for Shanghai listed firms convey heterogeneous information?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11.
    13. Nathan R. Berglund, 2020. "Do Client Bankruptcies Preceded by Clean Audit Opinions Damage Auditor Reputation?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1914-1951, September.
    14. Dennis M. O'Reilly, 2010. "Do investors perceive the going-concern opinion as useful for pricing stocks?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(1), pages 4-16, February.
    15. Muqaddas Khalid & Qaisar Abbas & Fizzah Malik & Shahid Ali, 2020. "Impact of audit committee attributes on financial distress: Evidence from Pakistan," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-19, March.
    16. J. Efrim Boritz & Duane B. Kennedy & Jerry Y. Sun, 2007. "Predicting Business Failures in Canada," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 141-165, May.
    17. Gregory Kane & Frederick Richardson & Uma Velury, 2006. "The Relevance of Stock and Flow-Based Reporting Information In Assessing the Likelihood of Emergence from Corporate Financial Distress," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 5-22, February.
    18. Ting Zhang & So Yean Kwack & Yi Si & Gaoliang Tian, 2023. "Non‐GAAP earnings reporting following going‐concern opinions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3217-3252, September.
    19. Agata Gniadkowska-Szymańska, 2022. "The liquidity of shares and the risk of bankruptcy," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(6), pages 565-586.
    20. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditing; Going-concern opinion; SAS No. 59; Information content;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:38:y:2000:i:1:p:209-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-8456 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.