IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v84y2016i2p179-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion: Making Progress in a Crowded Market

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Jon Horton

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Jon Horton, 2016. "Discussion: Making Progress in a Crowded Market," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 179-181, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:84:y:2016:i:2:p:179-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/insr.12150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas J. Horton & Johanna S. Hardin, 2015. "Teaching the Next Generation of Statistics Students to “Think With Data”: Special Issue on Statistics and the Undergraduate Curriculum," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 259-265, November.
    2. Robert Gould, 2010. "Statistics and the Modern Student," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(2), pages 297-315, August.
    3. George Cobb, 2015. "Mere Renovation is Too Little Too Late: We Need to Rethink our Undergraduate Curriculum from the Ground Up," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 266-282, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iddo Gal & Irena Ograjenšek, 2016. "Rejoinder: More on Enhancing Statistics Education with Qualitative Ideas," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 202-209, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger W. Hoerl & Ronald D. Snee, 2017. "Statistical Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 209-219, July.
    2. Amy L. Phelps & Kathryn A. Szabat, 2017. "The Current Landscape of Teaching Analytics to Business Students at Institutions of Higher Education: Who is Teaching What?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 155-161, April.
    3. Shonda Kuiper & Rodney X. Sturdivant, 2015. "Using Online Game-Based Simulations to Strengthen Students’ Understanding of Practical Statistical Issues in Real-World Data Analysis," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 354-361, November.
    4. Chris J. Wild, 2016. "Discussion: Locating Statistics in the World of Finding Out," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 194-202, August.
    5. Manuela Svoboda, 2022. "Evaluation of Motivation, Expectation, and Present Situation in 3rd Year Undergraduate Students of German Language and Literature at the University of Rijeka, Croatia," European Journal of Education Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, July -Dec.
    6. Alexander B. Sibley & Zhiguo Li & Yu Jiang & Yi-Ju Li & Cliburn Chan & Andrew Allen & Kouros Owzar, 2018. "Facilitating the Calculation of the Efficient Score Using Symbolic Computing," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 199-205, April.
    7. Scotland Leman & Leanna House & Andrew Hoegh, 2015. "Developing a New Interdisciplinary Computational Analytics Undergraduate Program: A Qualitative-Quantitative-Qualitative Approach," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 397-408, November.
    8. McLauchlan Cynthia & Schonlau Matthias, 2016. "Statistical Literacy in the Classroom: Should Introductory Statistics Courses Rethink their Goals?," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1-2), pages 99-115, December.
    9. Irena Ograjenšek & Iddo Gal, 2016. "Enhancing Statistics Education by Including Qualitative Research," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 165-178, August.
    10. Heejoo Suh & Sohyung Kim & Seonyoung Hwang & Sunyoung Han, 2020. "Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Key Competencies for Promoting Sustainability in a University Statistics Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Ryan Sterling McCulloch, 2017. "Learning Outcomes in a Laboratory Environment vs. Classroom for Statistics Instruction: An Alternative Approach Using Statistical Software," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(5), pages 131-131, October.
    12. Nicholas J. Horton, 2015. "Challenges and Opportunities for Statistics and Statistical Education: Looking Back, Looking Forward," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(2), pages 138-145, May.
    13. Daniel Kaplan, 2018. "Teaching Stats for Data Science," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 89-96, January.
    14. Jeff Witmer, 2017. "Bayes and MCMC for Undergraduates," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 259-264, July.
    15. Constance H. McLaren & Bruce J. McLaren, 2018. "SCOTS: The Searchable Collection of Time Series," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 12-22, September.
    16. Robert A. Stine, 2017. "Explaining Normal Quantile-Quantile Plots Through Animation: The Water-Filling Analogy," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 145-147, April.
    17. Lisa Dierker & Jane Robertson Evia & Karen Singer-Freeman & Kristin Woods & Janet Zupkus & Alan Arnholt & Elizabeth G Moliski & Natalie Delia Deckard & Kristel Gallagher & Jennifer Rose, 2018. "Project-Based Learning in Introductory Statistics: Comparing Course Experiences and Predicting Positive Outcomes for Students from Diverse Educational Settings," International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 52-64.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:84:y:2016:i:2:p:179-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.