IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v8y2004i3p33-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Waste Management

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Kijak
  • David Moy

Abstract

This article describes a decision support framework for the evaluation of scenarios for the integrated management of municipal solid waste within a local government area (LGA). The work is initially focused on local government (i.e., municipal councils) in the state of Queensland, Australia; however, it is broadly applicable to LGAs anywhere. The goal is to achieve sustainable waste management practices by balancing global and regional environmental impacts, social impacts at the local community level, and economic impacts. The framework integrates life‐cycle assessment (LCA) with other environmental, social, and economic tools. For this study, social and economic impacts are assumed to be similar across developed countries of the world. LCA was streamlined at both the life‐cycle inventory and life‐cycle impact assessment stages. For this process, spatial resolution is introduced into the LCA process to account for impacts occurring at the local and regional levels. This has been done by considering social impacts on the local community and by use of a regional procedure for LCA data for emissions to the environment that may have impacts at the regional level. The integration follows the structured approach of the pressure‐state‐response (PSR) model suggested by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This PSR model has been extended to encompass nonenvironmental issues and to guide the process of applying multiple tools. The framework primarily focuses on decision analysis and interpretation processes. Multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) is used to assist with the integration of qualitative and quantitative information. MAUT provides a well‐structured approach to information assessment and facilitates objective, transparent decisions. A commercially available decision analysis software package based on MAUT has been used as the platform for the framework developed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Kijak & David Moy, 2004. "A Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Waste Management," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(3), pages 33-50, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:8:y:2004:i:3:p:33-50
    DOI: 10.1162/1088198042442306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198042442306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/1088198042442306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wagner, Jeffrey, 2011. "Incentivizing sustainable waste management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 585-594, February.
    2. Bahman Peyravi & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2022. "Drivers in the Eco-Innovation Road to the Circular Economy: Organiational Capabilities and Exploitative Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Wang, Q. & Poh, K.L., 2014. "A survey of integrated decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 691-702.
    4. Yıldız-Geyhan, Eren & Altun-Çiftçioğlu, Gökçen Alev & Kadırgan, Mehmet Arif Neşet, 2017. "Social life cycle assessment of different packaging waste collection system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Christian Zurbrügg & Marco Caniato & Mentore Vaccari, 2014. "How Assessment Methods Can Support Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries—A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:8:y:2004:i:3:p:33-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.