IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i5p1771-1783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the risk of build failure on energy consumption in additive manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Han Wang
  • Martin Baumers
  • Shreeja Basak
  • Yinfeng He
  • Ian Ashcroft

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, is associated with significant promise in the manufacturing sector. However, it has been shown that the risk of build failure has a substantial impact on the costs of AM and that this results from a relatively high level of process instability. Importantly, for such a promising technology, the effects of the risk of build failure on energy consumption have not yet been studied, which creates a significant gap in the knowledge of the real environmental performance of AM. This research addresses this gap by investigating the energy consumption of AM subject to the possibility of build failure. This is done by constructing a novel expected energy consumption model, integrating process energy consumption, the energy embedded in the raw material, and the probability of build failure as a function of the number of layers deposited. Model parameters are obtained from a series of build experiments conducted on the AM technology variant polymeric laser sintering, also known as laser powder bed fusion of polymers. The energy consumption model shows that the risk of build failure accounts for a substantial share of overall expected energy consumption, amounting to up to approximately 31% at full capacity utilization. Additionally, this paper uncovers a complex relationship between the risk of build failure and efficiency gains in per unit energy consumption resulting from increasing levels of capacity utilization (Supporting Information S1).

Suggested Citation

  • Han Wang & Martin Baumers & Shreeja Basak & Yinfeng He & Ian Ashcroft, 2022. "The impact of the risk of build failure on energy consumption in additive manufacturing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1771-1783, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:5:p:1771-1783
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13318
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Tuck & Richard Hague & Neil Burns, 2007. "Rapid manufacturing: impact on supply chain methodologies and practice," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22.
    2. Martin Baumers & Chris Tuck & Ricky Wildman & Ian Ashcroft & Richard Hague, 2017. "Shape Complexity and Process Energy Consumption in Electron Beam Melting: A Case of Something for Nothing in Additive Manufacturing?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 157-167, November.
    3. Jan Holmström & Matthias Holweg & Siavash H. Khajavi & Jouni Partanen, 2016. "The direct digital manufacturing (r)evolution: definition of a research agenda," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Sun, Cheng & Wang, Yun & McMurtrey, Michael D. & Jerred, Nathan D. & Liou, Frank & Li, Ju, 2021. "Additive manufacturing for energy: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    5. Martin Baumers & Luca Beltrametti & Angelo Gasparre & Richard Hague, 2017. "Informing additive manufacturing technology adoption: total cost and the impact of capacity utilisation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 6957-6970, December.
    6. Yao Li & Guozhu Jia & Yang Cheng & Yuchen Hu, 2017. "Additive manufacturing technology in spare parts supply chain: a comparative study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1498-1515, March.
    7. Karel Kellens & Martin Baumers & Timothy G. Gutowski & William Flanagan & Reid Lifset & Joost R. Duflou, 2017. "Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 49-68, November.
    8. Ruihuan Ge & Joseph Flynn, 2022. "A computational method for detecting aspect ratio and problematic features in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 519-535, February.
    9. Jeremy Faludi & Martin Baumers & Ian Maskery & Richard Hague, 2017. "Environmental Impacts of Selective Laser Melting: Do Printer, Powder, Or Power Dominate?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 144-156, November.
    10. Grazia Maria Cappucci & Martina Pini & Paolo Neri & Marta Marassi & Elena Bassoli & Anna Maria Ferrari, 2020. "Environmental sustainability of orthopedic devices produced with powder bed fusion," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 681-694, June.
    11. Baumers, Martin & Dickens, Phill & Tuck, Chris & Hague, Richard, 2016. "The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 193-201.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.
    2. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Harshad Sonar & Vivek Khanzode & Milind Akarte, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing Enabled Supply Chain Management: A Review and Research Directions," Vision, , vol. 26(2), pages 147-162, June.
    4. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Ding, Jin & Baumers, Martin & Clark, Elizabeth A. & Wildman, Ricky D., 2021. "The economics of additive manufacturing: Towards a general cost model including process failure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. José M. González-Varona & David Poza & Fernando Acebes & Félix Villafáñez & Javier Pajares & Adolfo López-Paredes, 2020. "New Business Models for Sustainable Spare Parts Logistics: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Sun, Luoyi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Yixiao, 2020. "How to price 3D-printed products? Pricing strategy for 3D printing platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Martin Baumers & Luca Beltrametti & Angelo Gasparre & Richard Hague, 2017. "Informing additive manufacturing technology adoption: total cost and the impact of capacity utilisation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 6957-6970, December.
    10. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    11. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    12. Binoy Debnath & Md Shihab Shakur & Fahmida Tanjum & M. Azizur Rahman & Ziaul Haq Adnan, 2022. "Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Supply Chain of Aerospace Spare Parts Industry—A Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Kapetaniou, Chrystalla & Rieple, Alison & Pilkington, Alan & Frandsen, Thomas & Pisano, Paola, 2018. "Building the layers of a new manufacturing taxonomy: How 3D printing is creating a new landscape of production eco-systems and competitive dynamics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 22-35.
    14. Luis Isasi-Sanchez & Jesus Morcillo-Bellido & Jose Ignacio Ortiz-Gonzalez & Alfonso Duran-Heras, 2020. "Synergic Sustainability Implications of Additive Manufacturing in Automotive Spare Parts: A Case Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Radu Godina & Inês Ribeiro & Florinda Matos & Bruna T. Ferreira & Helena Carvalho & Paulo Peças, 2020. "Impact Assessment of Additive Manufacturing on Sustainable Business Models in Industry 4.0 Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Chekurov, Sergei & Metsä-Kortelainen, Sini & Salmi, Mika & Roda, Irene & Jussila, Ari, 2018. "The perceived value of additively manufactured digital spare parts in industry: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 87-97.
    17. Gokan May & Foivos Psarommatis, 2023. "Maximizing Energy Efficiency in Additive Manufacturing: A Review and Framework for Future Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-28, May.
    18. Beltagui, Ahmad & Kunz, Nathan & Gold, Stefan, 2020. "The role of 3D printing and open design on adoption of socially sustainable supply chain innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: Market dynamics of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 23-34.
    20. Abeliansky, Ana Lucia & Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Prettner, Klaus, 2020. "3D printing, international trade, and FDI," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 288-306.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:5:p:1771-1783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.