IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v25y2021i6p1588-1601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying uncertainty for AWARE characterization factors

Author

Listed:
  • Anne‐Marie Boulay
  • Pascal Lesage
  • Ben Amor
  • Stephan Pfister

Abstract

Although it is not yet current practice in life cycle assessment, it is recommended that impact assessment methods be accompanied by their uncertainty data to better guide the decision maker. This work uses the best available information to assess uncertainty of the AWARE model for water scarcity and corresponding sensitivities of input parameters. An uncertainty estimate for the AWARE characterization factors (CFs) is provided via (1) arrays (5000 values per CF) with statistics, (2) dispersion analysis, and (3) distribution best fit and parameters. Results show that uncertainty, represented by the dispersion of the values, varies significantly around the world and tends to be more important in regions of higher scarcity and low in most regions around the world (area based) in terms of absolute spread. Globally, values of 18.8 and 66.28 are found for the spread, represented by the interpercentile range (95%) and interquartile range (25–75%), respectively. The lognormal distribution shows the best fit for most regions around the world and could be used as a default distribution. Two parameters come out as influential: actual water availability (because of precipitation uncertainty) and the global hydrological model itself (because of the variability of results obtained from different models). When compared with uncertainty associated with spatio‐temporal variability, uncertainties found in this work are generally lower, and hence improving resolution in water scarcity assessments (to monthly and watershed levels) should remain the priority. Finally, required data for software integration of AWARE uncertainty are provided. This article met the requirements for a Gold‐Gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne‐Marie Boulay & Pascal Lesage & Ben Amor & Stephan Pfister, 2021. "Quantifying uncertainty for AWARE characterization factors," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1588-1601, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:25:y:2021:i:6:p:1588-1601
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13173
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrik J G Henriksson & Reinout Heijungs & Hai M Dao & Lam T Phan & Geert R de Snoo & Jeroen B Guinée, 2015. "Product Carbon Footprints and Their Uncertainties in Comparative Decision Contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Wout Slob, 1994. "Uncertainty Analysis in Multiplicative Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 571-576, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Cucurachi & Carlos Felipe Blanco & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs, 2022. "Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment‐independent global sensitivity analysis for full‐scale life cycle assessment models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 374-391, April.
    2. Tomás Marín & Jing Wu & Xu Wu & Zimin Ying & Qiaoling Lu & Yiyuan Hong & Xiaoyan Wang & Wu Yang, 2019. "Resource Use in Mariculture: A Case Study in Southeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. W. Slob & M. N. Pieters, 1998. "A Probabilistic Approach for Deriving Acceptable Human Intake Limits and Human Health Risks from Toxicological Studies: General Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 787-798, December.
    4. Andrew Berardy & Carol S. Johnston & Alexandra Plukis & Maricarmen Vizcaino & Christopher Wharton, 2019. "Integrating Protein Quality and Quantity with Environmental Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Mu, W. & Groen, E.A. & van Middelaar, C.E. & Bokkers, E.A.M. & Hennart, S. & Stilmant, D. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2017. "Benchmarking nutrient use efficiency of dairy farms: The effect of epistemic uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 25-33.
    6. Bas Groot Koerkamp & Theo Stijnen & Milton C. Weinstein & M. G. Myriam Hunink, 2011. "The Combined Analysis of Uncertainty and Patient Heterogeneity in Medical Decision Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(4), pages 650-661, July.
    7. S. N. Rai & D. Krewski, 1998. "Uncertainty and Variability Analysis in Multiplicative Risk Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 37-45, February.
    8. Steffen Kiemel & Chantal Rietdorf & Maximilian Schutzbach & Robert Miehe, 2022. "How to Simplify Life Cycle Assessment for Industrial Applications—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Nicholas Z. Muller & Yan N. Oak, 2009. "Characterizing Uncertainty in Air Pollution Damage Estimates," Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0918, Middlebury College, Department of Economics.
    10. David W. Gaylor & James J. Chen, 1996. "A Simple Upper Limit for the Sum of the Risks of the Components in a Mixture," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 395-398, June.
    11. Kevin P. Brand & Mitchell J. Small, 1995. "Updating Uncertainty in an Integrated Risk Assessment: Conceptual Framework and Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 719-729, December.
    12. Nhu, Trang T. & Le, Quan H. & Heide, Peter ter & Bosma, Roel & Sorgeloos, Patrick & Dewulf, Jo & Schaubroeck, Thomas, 2016. "Inferred equations for predicting cumulative exergy extraction throughout cradle-to-gate life cycles of Pangasius feeds and intensive Pangasius grow-out farms in Vietnam," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 42-49.
    13. Kai Lessmann & Andreas Beyer & Jörg Klasmeier & Michael Matthies, 2005. "Influence of Distributional Shape of Substance Parameters on Exposure Model Output," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 1137-1145, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:25:y:2021:i:6:p:1588-1601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.