IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i2p701-721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interfaces of domestic violence and organization: Gendered violence and inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Tracy Wilcox
  • Michelle Greenwood
  • Alison Pullen
  • Anne O’Leary Kelly
  • Deborah Jones

Abstract

Domestic violence is a global pandemic. Domestic violence is gendered violence and perpetuates women's inequality. Women experience domestic violence at higher rates than men, and the perpetrators are, more often than not, men. Organizations play an essential role in addressing domestic violence. This article establishes the relationship between domestic violence and organizations at four interfaces of contemporary relevance, to make visible the ways in which domestic violence sustains gender inequality. Interfaces that are central to problematizing domestic violence and organization are discussed: domestic–work; business–society; men–women; and mind/rationality–body/emotion. Adopting the heuristic of interfaces draws our attention to the boundaries that separate fields but also that which connects them, enabling multidisciplinary research across domestic violence to be reviewed in a way that surfaces both the complexities and the organizational responsibility for action‐based change in practice and scholarship. The article concludes by calling for future research that transcends practice and scholarship.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracy Wilcox & Michelle Greenwood & Alison Pullen & Anne O’Leary Kelly & Deborah Jones, 2021. "Interfaces of domestic violence and organization: Gendered violence and inequality," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 701-721, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:701-721
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12515
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCarthy, Lauren, 2017. "Empowering Women Through Corporate Social Responsibility: A Feminist Foucauldian Critique," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 603-631, October.
    2. Patricia Lewis & Banu Ozkazanc‐Pan & Alison Pullen, 2018. "Gender, Work and Organization developments in 2018," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 437-442, September.
    3. Rafael Alcadipani, 2020. "Pandemic and macho organizations: Wake‐up call or business as usual?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 734-746, September.
    4. Paulo Soares Esteves & Miguel Portela & António Rua, 2022. "Does Domestic Demand Matter for Firms’ Exports?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 311-332, April.
    5. Aida Alvinius & Arita Holmberg, 2019. "Silence‐breaking butterfly effect: Resistance towards the military within #MeToo," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 1255-1270, September.
    6. Alison Pullen & Sheena Vachhani & Suzanne Gagnon & Nelarine Cornelius, 2017. "Editorial: Critical Diversity, Philosophy and Praxis," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 451-456, September.
    7. Andreas Georg Scherer & Andreas Rasche & Guido Palazzo & André Spicer, 2016. "Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 273-298, May.
    8. Guido Palazzo & Andreas Scherer, 2006. "Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 71-88, June.
    9. Patricia Lewis & Alison Pullen, 2018. "Gender, Work and Organization in 2018," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 107-109, March.
    10. Anna Aizer, 2010. "The Gender Wage Gap and Domestic Violence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1847-1859, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlotte M. Karam & Michelle Greenwood & Laura Kauzlarich & Anne O’Leary Kelly & Tracy Wilcox, 2023. "Intimate Partner Violence and Business: Exploring the Boundaries of Ethical Enquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 645-655, November.
    2. Indira Saktaganova & Svetlana Surkova & Baurzhan Smatlayev & Alpysbai Zhussupov & Kanat Abdilov, 2023. "Effectiveness of human protection from domestic violence under the administrative legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1 suppl.), pages 279-294.
    3. Layla Branicki & Senia Kalfa & Alison Pullen & Stephen Brammer, 2023. "Corporate Responses to Intimate Partner Violence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 657-677, November.
    4. Julia Coffey & David Farrugia & Rosalind Gill & Steven Threadgold & Megan Sharp & Lisa Adkins, 2023. "Femininity work: The gendered politics of women managing violence in bar work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 1694-1708, September.
    5. Jeff Hearn & Matthew Hall & Ruth Lewis & Charlotta Niemistö, 2023. "The Spread of Digital Intimate Partner Violence: Ethical Challenges for Business, Workplaces, Employers and Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 695-711, November.
    6. Nathalie Clavijo, 2023. "Mi casa de los Espíritus (My house of spirits): Challenging patriarchy with magical feminism," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 1795-1815, September.
    7. Edwina Pio & Vikashni Moore, 2022. "Battered South‐Asian diasporic women: Culture, secrets and work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 536-560, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banu Ozkazanc-Pan, 2019. "CSR as Gendered Neocoloniality in the Global South," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 851-864, December.
    2. Andersen, Sophie Esmann & Johansen, Trine Susanne, 2021. "Corporate citizenship: Challenging the corporate centricity in corporate marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 686-699.
    3. Anna-Lena Maier & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert, 2023. "Deliberating with the Autocrats? A Case Study on the Limitations and Potential of Political CSR in a Non-Democratic Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 11-32, April.
    4. Loliya Akobo Kagher & Lilian Otaye‐Ebede & Beverly Metcalfe, 2021. "Black lives and bodywork matters: A postcolonial critique of gender and embodiment in Nigeria," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 1787-1804, September.
    5. Peter Rodgers & Peter Stokes & Shlomo Tarba & Zaheer Khan, 2019. "The Role of Non-market Strategies in Establishing Legitimacy: The Case of Service MNEs in Emerging Economies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 515-540, August.
    6. Robert C. Bird & Vivek Soundararajan, 2020. "The Role of Precontractual Signals in Creating Sustainable Global Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 81-94, June.
    7. Andrew Johnston & Kenneth Amaeshi & Emmanuel Adegbite & Onyeka Osuji, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility as Obligated Internalisation of Social Costs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 39-52, April.
    8. Anna-Lena Maier, 2021. "Political corporate social responsibility in authoritarian contexts," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 476-495, December.
    9. Gastón de los Reyes & Markus Scholz, 2023. "Assessing the Legitimacy of Corporate Political Activity: Uber and the Quest for Responsible Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 51-69, April.
    10. Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes & Steffen Böhm, 2023. "The Political Ontology of Corporate Social Responsibility: Obscuring the Pluriverse in Place," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 245-261, June.
    11. Fabrizio Ferraro & Daniel Beunza, 2018. "Creating Common Ground: A Communicative Action Model of Dialogue in Shareholder Engagement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1187-1207, December.
    12. Verena Girschik, 2020. "Managing Legitimacy in Business‐Driven Social Change: The Role of Relational Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 775-804, June.
    13. Melanie Richards & Thomas Zellweger & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2017. "Maintaining Moral Legitimacy through Worlds and Words: An Explanation of Firms' Investment in Sustainability Certification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 676-710, July.
    14. Christopher Wickert & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2023. "Taking the P in political corporate social responsibility seriously," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(5), pages 928-937, July.
    15. Martin Fougère & Nikodemus Solitander, 2020. "Dissent in Consensusland: An Agonistic Problematization of Multi-stakeholder Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 683-699, July.
    16. Jun Jie Yang & Lai Si Tsui-Auch & Xueli Wang, 2023. "Dehybridization in the Face of the Party-State: A Longitudinal Case Study of a Chinese SOE's Corporate Governance Responses to Institutional Change," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 661-678, January.
    17. Stephanie Schrage & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert, 2021. "Addressing Governance Gaps in Global Value Chains: Introducing a Systematic Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 657-672, May.
    18. Helen Etchanchu & Marie-Laure Djelic, 2019. "Old Wine in New Bottles? Parentalism, Power, and Its Legitimacy in Business–Society Relations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 893-911, December.
    19. Marco Colagrossi & Claudio Deiana & Andrea Geraci & Ludovica Giua, 2022. "Hang up on stereotypes: Domestic violence and an anti‐abuse helpline campaign," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(4), pages 585-611, October.
    20. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:701-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.