IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v17y2018i2p38-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brexit's Agri‐trade Impacts on the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Siemen van Berkum
  • Roel Jongeneel
  • Myrna van Leeuwen

Abstract

The UK is an important market for the Dutch agri‐food sector, 10 per cent of all Dutch agricultural exports find their way to the UK. In this article the effects of two possible post‐Brexit trade scenarios on Dutch agricultural trade are quantified. Model simulations indicate that Dutch exports to the UK and the rest of the world will be affected only marginally under a Free Trade Agreement between the EU and the UK. A WTO scenario will have more, yet still relatively modest, impact on Dutch exports as a result of Dutch price competitiveness in the UK market. The agricultural production value in the Netherlands will decline by around 2 per cent, mainly because of declining prices that are the result of price pressure in the EU market as a consequence of Brexit‐related trade distortions. Possible impacts of non‐tariff measures on trade costs are not included in the quantification. However, the UK government could request quality and/or food safety conditions on imports that are different from the current EU trade conditions. Whether the UK will do so is yet unknown, and hence provides an enormous uncertainty to businesses engaged in trade with the UK. Le Royaume‐Uni est un marché important pour le secteur agroalimentaire néerlandais, 10% de toutes les exportations agricoles néerlandaises aboutissant au Royaume‐Uni. Dans cet article, les effets de deux scénarios de commerce possibles post‐Brexit sur le commerce agricole néerlandais sont quantifiés. Des simulations réalisées à partir de modèles indiquent que les exportations néerlandaises vers le Royaume‐Uni et le reste du monde ne seront que légèrement affectées par un accord de libre‐échange entre l'Union européenne et le Royaume‐Uni. Un scénario OMC aura plus d'impacts, quoique relativement modestes, sur les exportations néerlandaises en raison de la compétitivité des prix néerlandais sur le marché britannique. La valeur de la production agricole aux Pays‐Bas diminuera d'environ 2%, principalement en raison de la baisse des prix qui résulte de la pression sur les prix communautaires en raison des distorsions commerciales liées au Brexit. Les impacts possibles des mesures non tarifaires sur les coûts commerciaux ne sont pas pris en compte dans la quantification. Cependant, le gouvernement du Royaume‐Uni pourrait demander des conditions de qualité et / ou de sécurité des aliments importés qui soient différentes des conditions commerciales actuelles de l'Union européenne. On ne sait pas encore ce que fera le Royaume‐Uni, ce qui par conséquent fait peser une énorme incertitude sur les entreprises engagées dans le commerce avec le Royaume‐Uni. Das Vereinigte Königreich ist ein wichtiger Markt für den niederländischen Agrar‐ und Ernährungssektor. 10 Prozent aller niederländischen Agrarexporte gehen in das Vereinigte Königreich. In diesem Artikel werden die Auswirkungen zweier möglicher Post‐Brexit‐Handelsszenarien auf den niederländischen Agrarhandel quantifiziert. Die Modellrechnungen zeigen, dass im Falle eines Freihandelsabkommens zwischen der EU und dem Vereinigten Königreich die niederländischen Exporte in das Vereinigte Königreich und den Rest der Welt nur geringfügig betroffen wären. Ein „WTO‐Szenario” würde sich zwar stärker, aber immer noch relativ moderat auf die niederländischen Exporte auswirken. Der Grund hierfür ist die preisliche Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Niederlande auf dem britischen Markt. Der Produktionswert in der niederländischen Agrarwirtschaft würde sich um etwa zwei Prozent verringern, was hauptsächlich auf sinkende Preise zurückzuführen ist. Diese sind eine Folge des Preisdrucks auf dem EU‐Markt, welcher auf Handelsverzerrungen durch den Brexit beruht. Mögliche Auswirkungen nichttarifärer Maßnahmen auf die Handelskosten werden in den Berechnungen nicht berücksichtigt. Die britische Regierung könnte jedoch Bedingungen hinsichtlich der Qualität und/oder Lebensmittelsicherheit für Importe stellen, die sich von den derzeitigen EU‐Handelsbedingungen unterscheiden. Ob das Vereinigte Königreich dies tun wird, ist noch nicht bekannt und stellt daher eine enorme Unsicherheit für Unternehmen dar, die mit dem Vereinigten Königreich Handel treiben.

Suggested Citation

  • Siemen van Berkum & Roel Jongeneel & Myrna van Leeuwen, 2018. "Brexit's Agri‐trade Impacts on the Netherlands," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(2), pages 38-46, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:38-46
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Boulanger & George Philippidis, 2015. "The End of a Romance? A Note on the Quantitative Impacts of a ‘Brexit’ from the EU," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 832-842, September.
    2. Brian J. Revell, 2017. "Brexit and Tariff Rate Quotas on EU Imports: A Complex Problem," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(2), pages 10-17, August.
    3. Donner Abreu, Maria, 2013. "Preferential rules of origin In regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2013-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roel Jongeneel & Siemen Berkum & Hans Vrolijk, 2016. "Summary," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 15(2), pages 26-33, August.
    2. Paulo Ferreira & Éder Pereira, 2019. "The impact of the Brexit referendum on British and European Union bank shares: a cross-correlation analysis with national indices," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 335-346.
    3. Marcin Pigłowski, 2021. "The Intra-European Union Food Trade with the Relation to the Notifications in the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Jacqueline Karlsson & Helena Melin & Kevin Cullinane, 2018. "The impact of potential Brexit scenarios on German car exports to the UK: an application of the gravity model," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2018. "Impact of border barriers, returning migrants, and trade diversion in Brexit: Firm exit and loss of variety," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 193-204.
    6. Jaime DE MELO & Ben SHEPHERD, 2018. "The Economics of Non-Tariff Measures: A Primer," Working Papers P212, FERDI.
    7. Mitchell, Lorraine S., 2018. "Brexit and the UK’s Agricultural Trade," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274268, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Alan Swinbank, 2022. "The UK’s Agri‐food Trade Policies One Year On From Brexit," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(2), pages 11-18, August.
    9. Banse, Martin & Freund, Florian, 2018. "Mögliche Auswirkungen eines harten oder weichen Brexit auf die deutsche Landwirtschaft - Update," Thünen Working Papers 95, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    10. Crafts, Nicholas, 2016. "The Growth Effects of EU Membership for the UK: a Review of the Evidence," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 280, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    11. Azmeh, Shamel, 2015. "Transient global value chains and preferential trade agreements: rules of origin in US trade agreements with Jordan and Egypt," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64601, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Yaghoob Jafari & Wolfgang Britz, 2020. "Brexit: an economy-wide impact assessment on trade, immigration, and foreign direct investment," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 17-52, February.
    13. Carmen Hubbard & John Davis & Siyi Feng & David Harvey & Anne Liddon & Andrew Moxey & Mercy Ojo & Myles Patton & George Philippidis & Charles Scott & Shailesh Shrestha & Michael Wallace, 2018. "Brexit: How Will UK Agriculture Fare?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(2), pages 19-26, August.
    14. Nobuhiro Hosoe, 2016. "Impact of Brexit: Firm Exit and Loss of Variety," GRIPS Discussion Papers 16-12, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    15. Nogues, Julio, 2018. "Brexit trade impacts and Mercosur's negotiations with Europe," MPRA Paper 87416, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ferrer, Jorge N��ez & Rinaldi, David, 2016. "The Impact of Brexit on the EU Budget: A non-catastrophic event," CEPS Papers 11814, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    17. Tim Josling & Mechel Paggi & John Wainio & Fumiko Yamazaki, 2015. "Latin American Agriculture in a World of Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(2), pages 546-567.
    18. Samitas, Aristeidis & Polyzos, Stathis & Siriopoulos, Costas, 2018. "Brexit and financial stability: An agent-based simulation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 181-192.
    19. Grochowska, Renata & Kosior, Katarzyna, 2016. "EU budget negotiations in the shadow of the juste retour rule," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 252637, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    20. Alan Swinbank, 2016. "Summary," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 15(2), pages 5-10, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:38-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.