This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Alfred Marshall's Mecca: Reconciling the Theories of Value and Development Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics J. STANLEY METCALFE
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
The purpose of this paper is to explore the evolutionary nature and content of Marshall's theory of value and the relation it bears to his theory of growth and development. In Marshall's work the two theories are inextricably linked, and the subsequent attempt to separate them has not only marginalised Marshall's rich analysis but also made it impossible to appreciate the role he gave to innovation, and its corollary the growth of knowledge and organisation, in the workings of a market economy. At its core is the relation between the growth of firms and the growth of markets, but this is not steady-state growth theory; rather, it is the different, mutually determined and ever changing growth rates of different groups of firms that is at the centre of attention. Quite how variation is linked to progress is the central topic of this essay, and the elucidation of its central role necessarily means that we must resurrect the representative firm. We conclude that Marshall was correct in stating that 'the tendency to variation is a chief source of progress' (Principles, V, 4, p. 355). We develop a set of evolutionary tools to show how and why this is so. But evolution is more than variation; it requires the organisation of firms and the market process to generate that correlation between differential knowledge and economic advance. Most importantly of all, the concept of a representative firm is re-established as an indispensable element in a Marshallian evolutionary analysis. Copyright © 2007 The Economic Society of Australia.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by The Economic Society of Australia in its journal Economic Record .
Volume (Year): 83 (2007)
Issue (Month): s1 (09)
Pages: S1-S22
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML ,
plain text ,
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:83:y:2007:i:s1:p:s1-s22Contact details of provider: Postal: Central Council Administration, L.P.O. Box 2161, Hawthorn VIC 3122 Phone: 61 3 9497 4140 Fax: 61 3 9497 4140 Email: Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0013-0249 More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0013-0249
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? A tutorial is available.
This page was last updated on 2008-10-26.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .