IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v36y2018i4p483-501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous peoples, the city and inclusive urban development policies in Latin America: Lessons from Bolivia and Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Horn

Abstract

The historical construction of indigeneity as essentially rural policy category represents a key cause for the ongoing exclusion of urban indigenous peoples and blocks progress in delivering Agenda 2030 in Latin American cities. Even in Bolivia and Ecuador, where urban indigeneity is recognized through constitutional reforms, there are obstacles to the delivery of policies shaped to urban indigenous interests. By reviewing experiences from these countries, this article highlights that policy delivery problems are a result of multiple factors, including (1) rural constructions of indigeneity, (2) conflicting development priorities, and (3) difficulties in promoting universal rights while simultaneously guaranteeing indigenous rights. The article concludes with policy recommendations for more inclusive urban development approaches which leave no indigenous person behind.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Horn, 2018. "Indigenous peoples, the city and inclusive urban development policies in Latin America: Lessons from Bolivia and Ecuador," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(4), pages 483-501, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:36:y:2018:i:4:p:483-501
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12234
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Gudynas, 2011. "Buen Vivir: Today's tomorrow," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 54(4), pages 441-447, December.
    2. Celine Germond-Duret, 2016. "Tradition and modernity: an obsolete dichotomy? Binary thinking, indigenous peoples and normalisation," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1537-1558, September.
    3. Meera Tiwari & Flavio Comim, 2015. "The Post‐2015 Global Development Agenda: A Latin American Perspective," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 330-344, April.
    4. Melissa Marschke & David Szablowski & Peter Vandergeest, 2008. "Engaging Indigeneity in Development Policy," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 26(4), pages 483-500, July.
    5. Catherine Walsh, 2010. "Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 53(1), pages 15-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joe Gerlach, 2017. "Ecuador’s experiment in living well: Sumak kawsay, Spinoza and the inadequacy of ideas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2241-2260, October.
    2. Murat Arsel & Aram Ziai, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 833-854, July.
    3. Roberta Masala & Salvatore Monni, 2019. "The Social Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples in Ecuador Before and During the Revolución Ciudadana," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 62(1), pages 167-177, December.
    4. Torres, Bolier & Günter, Sven & Acevedo-Cabra, Ricardo & Knoke, Thomas, 2018. "Livelihood strategies, ethnicity and rural income: The case of migrant settlers and indigenous populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 22-34.
    5. Salvatore Monni & Massimo Pallottino, 2013. "Beyond growth and development: Buen Vivir as an alternative to current paradigms," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0172, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    6. Nicolò Barbieri & Lucia Dal Negro & Claudia Ghisetti & Susanna Mancinelli & Alberto Marzucchi & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Simone Tagliapietra & Roberto Zoboli, 2017. "Green-oriented Knowledge Transfers in global markets: technologies, capabilities, institutions," SEEDS Working Papers 1117, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Dec 2017.
    7. Latorre, Sara & Malo-Larrea, Antonio, 2019. "Policy-making Related Actors' Understandings About Nature-society Relationship: Beyond Modern Ontologies? The Case of Cuenca, Ecuador," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 387-396.
    8. Jeff Rose & Adrienne Cachelin, 2018. "Critical sustainability: incorporating critical theories into contested sustainabilities," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 518-525, December.
    9. Karolien van Teijlingen & Barbara Hogenboom, 2016. "Debating Alternative Development at the Mining Frontier: Buen Vivir and the Conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 382-420, December.
    10. Deribe Assefa Aga & N. Noorderhaven & B. Vallejo, 2018. "Project beneficiary participation and behavioural intentions promoting project sustainability: The mediating role of psychological ownership," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(5), pages 527-546, September.
    11. Beling, Adrián E. & Vanhulst, Julien & Demaria, Federico & Rabi, Violeta & Carballo, Ana E. & Pelenc, Jérôme, 2018. "Discursive Synergies for a ‘Great Transformation’ Towards Sustainability: Pragmatic Contributions to a Necessary Dialogue Between Human Development, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 304-313.
    12. Salvatore Monni & Luca Serafini, 2017. "A Dangerous Alliance? The Relationship Between Ecuador and China," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 60(3), pages 213-221, December.
    13. Marina Mero-Figueroa & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez & Laura Piedra-Muñoz & Moisés Obaco, 2020. "Measuring Well-Being: A Buen Vivir (Living Well) Indicator for Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 265-287, November.
    14. Kauffman, Craig M. & Martin, Pamela L., 2017. "Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 130-142.
    15. Daniel Coq-Huelva & Bolier Torres-Navarrete & Carlos Bueno-Suárez, 2018. "Indigenous worldviews and Western conventions: Sumak Kawsay and cocoa production in Ecuadorian Amazonia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(1), pages 163-179, March.
    16. Cappelli, Federica & Caravaggio, Nicola & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Buen Vivir and forest conservation in Bolivia: False promises or effective change?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Janet J. McIntyre‐Mills, 2021. "Communication and culture: A multispecies endeavour within a shared habitat," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 671-684, October.
    18. Katia Valenzuela-Fuentes & Esteban Alarcón-Barrueto & Robinson Torres-Salinas, 2021. "From Resistance to Creation: Socio-Environmental Activism in Chile’s “Sacrifice Zones”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Velasco-Herrejón, Paola & Bauwens, Thomas & Calisto Friant, Martin, 2022. "Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:36:y:2018:i:4:p:483-501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.