IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i2p1057-1072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient and robust methods for causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Transporting inferences from multiple randomized trials to a target population

Author

Listed:
  • Issa J. Dahabreh
  • Sarah E. Robertson
  • Lucia C. Petito
  • Miguel A. Hernán
  • Jon A. Steingrimsson

Abstract

We present methods for causally interpretable meta‐analyses that combine information from multiple randomized trials to draw causal inferences for a target population of substantive interest. We consider identifiability conditions, derive implications of the conditions for the law of the observed data, and obtain identification results for transporting causal inferences from a collection of independent randomized trials to a new target population in which experimental data may not be available. We propose an estimator for the potential outcome mean in the target population under each treatment studied in the trials. The estimator uses covariate, treatment, and outcome data from the collection of trials, but only covariate data from the target population sample. We show that it is doubly robust in the sense that it is consistent and asymptotically normal when at least one of the models it relies on is correctly specified. We study the finite sample properties of the estimator in simulation studies and demonstrate its implementation using data from a multicenter randomized trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Issa J. Dahabreh & Sarah E. Robertson & Lucia C. Petito & Miguel A. Hernán & Jon A. Steingrimsson, 2023. "Efficient and robust methods for causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Transporting inferences from multiple randomized trials to a target population," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1057-1072, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:2:p:1057-1072
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13716
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kara E. Rudolph & Mark J. Laan, 2017. "Robust estimation of encouragement design intervention effects transported across sites," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1509-1525, November.
    2. Norman E. Breslow & Jon A. Wellner, 2007. "Weighted Likelihood for Semiparametric Models and Two‐phase Stratified Samples, with Application to Cox Regression," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(1), pages 86-102, March.
    3. E. H. Kennedy & A. Sjölander & D. S. Small, 2015. "Semiparametric causal inference in matched cohort studies," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(3), pages 739-746.
    4. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504.
    5. Jeffery Racine & Jeffrey Hart & Qi Li, 2006. "Testing the Significance of Categorical Predictor Variables in Nonparametric Regression Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 523-544.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melody Y Huang & Sarah E Robertson & Harsh Parikh, 2024. "Towards Generalizing Inferences from Trials to Target Populations," Papers 2402.17042, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinyu Li & Wang Miao & Fang Lu & Xiao‐Hua Zhou, 2023. "Improving efficiency of inference in clinical trials with external control data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 394-403, March.
    2. Laurent Davezies & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Yannick Guyonvarch, 2019. "Empirical Process Results for Exchangeable Arrays," Papers 1906.11293, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    3. Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022. "Which Findings Should Be Published?," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
    4. Patrice Bertail & Emilie Chautru & Stephan Clémençon, 2017. "Empirical Processes in Survey Sampling with (Conditional) Poisson Designs," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 97-111, March.
    5. Hans R. A. Koster & Jos N. van Ommeren & Piet Rietveld, 2016. "Historic amenities, income and sorting of households," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 203-236.
    6. Kasy, Maximilian, 2011. "A nonparametric test for path dependence in discrete panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 172-175.
    7. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2020. "Causal Inference under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Papers 2004.08318, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    8. Atı̇la Abdulkadı̇roğlu & Joshua D. Angrist & Yusuke Narita & Parag Pathak, 2022. "Breaking Ties: Regression Discontinuity Design Meets Market Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 117-151, January.
    9. Qingning Zhou & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2018. "Outcome†dependent sampling with interval†censored failure time data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 58-67, March.
    10. Waverly Wei & Maya Petersen & Mark J van der Laan & Zeyu Zheng & Chong Wu & Jingshen Wang, 2023. "Efficient targeted learning of heterogeneous treatment effects for multiple subgroups," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1934-1946, September.
    11. Yao, Haixiang & Huang, Jinbo & Li, Yong & Humphrey, Jacquelyn E., 2021. "A general approach to smooth and convex portfolio optimization using lower partial moments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Luo, Yu & Graham, Daniel J. & McCoy, Emma J., 2023. "Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Ashesh Rambachan & Jonathan Roth, 2020. "Design-Based Uncertainty for Quasi-Experiments," Papers 2008.00602, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    14. Amanda Coston & Edward H. Kennedy, 2022. "The role of the geometric mean in case-control studies," Papers 2207.09016, arXiv.org.
    15. Li, J. & Nott, D.J. & Fan, Y. & Sisson, S.A., 2017. "Extending approximate Bayesian computation methods to high dimensions via a Gaussian copula model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 77-89.
    16. Benjamin Lu & Eli Ben-Michael & Avi Feller & Luke Miratrix, 2023. "Is It Who You Are or Where You Are? Accounting for Compositional Differences in Cross-Site Treatment Effect Variation," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(4), pages 420-453, August.
    17. Denis Koshelev & Alexey Ponomarenko & Sergei Seleznev, 2023. "Amortized neural networks for agent-based model forecasting," Papers 2308.05753, arXiv.org.
    18. Debashis Ghosh, 2004. "Semiparametric methods for the binormal model with multiple biomarkers," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1046, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    19. Yao Luo & Peijun Sang, 2022. "Penalized Sieve Estimation of Structural Models," Papers 2204.13488, arXiv.org.
    20. Brian D. Williamson & Peter B. Gilbert & Marco Carone & Noah Simon, 2021. "Nonparametric variable importance assessment using machine learning techniques," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 9-22, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:2:p:1057-1072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.