IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v61y2005i3p757-766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Risk Assessment for Multivariate Continuous Outcomes with Application to Neurotoxicology: The Bivariate Case

Author

Listed:
  • Zi-Fan Yu
  • Paul J. Catalano

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zi-Fan Yu & Paul J. Catalano, 2005. "Quantitative Risk Assessment for Multivariate Continuous Outcomes with Application to Neurotoxicology: The Bivariate Case," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 757-766, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:61:y:2005:i:3:p:757-766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00350.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenny S. Crump, 1995. "Calculation of Benchmark Doses from Continuous Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 79-89, February.
    2. Meredith M. Regan & Paul J. Catalano, 1999. "Likelihood Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Out comes: Application to Developmental Toxicology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 760-768, September.
    3. Newey, Whitney K & Powell, James L, 1987. "Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 819-847, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Signe M. Jensen & Felix M. Kluxen & Christian Ritz, 2019. "A Review of Recent Advances in Benchmark Dose Methodology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(10), pages 2295-2315, October.
    2. Zi‐Fan Yu & Paul J. Catzlano, 2008. "A Simulation Study of Quantitative Risk Assessment for Bivariate Continuous Outcomes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1415-1430, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akosah, Nana Kwame & Alagidede, Imhotep Paul & Schaling, Eric, 2020. "Testing for asymmetry in monetary policy rule for small-open developing economies: Multiscale Bayesian quantile evidence from Ghana," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    2. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2023. "Testing Granger Non-Causality in Expectiles," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2023-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    3. Alois Pichler, 2024. "Higher order measures of risk and stochastic dominance," Papers 2402.15387, arXiv.org.
    4. Chen, Yu & Ma, Mengyuan & Sun, Hongfang, 2023. "Statistical inference for extreme extremile in heavy-tailed heteroscedastic regression model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-162.
    5. Otto-Sobotka, Fabian & Salvati, Nicola & Ranalli, Maria Giovanna & Kneib, Thomas, 2019. "Adaptive semiparametric M-quantile regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 116-129.
    6. Claudia Pacella, 2020. "Essays on Forecasting," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/307579, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. H. Kaibuchi & Y. Kawasaki & G. Stupfler, 2022. "GARCH-UGH: a bias-reduced approach for dynamic extreme Value-at-Risk estimation in financial time series," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1277-1294, July.
    8. Petra Burdejová & Wolfgang K. Härdle, 2019. "Dynamic semi-parametric factor model for functional expectiles," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 489-502, June.
    9. Said Khalil, 2022. "Expectile-based capital allocation," Working Papers hal-03816525, HAL.
    10. Litimein, Ouahiba & Laksaci, Ali & Mechab, Boubaker & Bouzebda, Salim, 2023. "Local linear estimate of the functional expectile regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Parente, Paulo M.D.C. & Smith, Richard J., 2011. "Gel Methods For Nonsmooth Moment Indicators," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 74-113, February.
    12. Bastianin, Andrea & Galeotti, Marzio & Manera, Matteo, 2014. "Causality and predictability in distribution: The ethanol–food price relation revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 152-160.
    13. Dingshi Tian & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang, 2018. "Econometric Modeling of Risk Measures: A Selective Review of the Recent Literature," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201807, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2018.
    14. Machado, Jose A. F. & Silva, J. M. C. Santos, 2000. "Glejser's test revisited," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 189-202, July.
    15. Akosah, Nana & Alagidede, Imhotep & Schaling, Eric, 2019. "Unfolding the monetary policy rule in Ghana: quantile-based evidence within time-frequency framework," MPRA Paper 103260, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    16. Qinyu Wu & Fan Yang & Ping Zhang, 2023. "Conditional generalized quantiles based on expected utility model and equivalent characterization of properties," Papers 2301.12420, arXiv.org.
    17. Moshe Buchinsky, 1998. "Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(1), pages 88-126.
    18. Chunrong Ai & Oliver Linton & Kaiji Motegi & Zheng Zhang, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 779-816, July.
    19. Marco Bottone & Lea Petrella & Mauro Bernardi, 2021. "Unified Bayesian conditional autoregressive risk measures using the skew exponential power distribution," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 1079-1107, September.
    20. G. Bertarelli & R. Chambers & N. Salvati, 2021. "Outlier robust small domain estimation via bias correction and robust bootstrapping," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(1), pages 331-357, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:61:y:2005:i:3:p:757-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.