IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v10y2023i10p224-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reward Systems and Organizational Performance of Public Universities in South-South, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • OKWUISE, U. Young

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria)

  • UZOECHINA, Philomena Nkemdilim

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study examined the effects of reward system on organizational performance of public universities in South-South, Nigeria. The specific objectives were to determine the extent to which dimensions of reward systems (employee salary increase and promotion) affect organizational performance. The study adopted the survey research design and data was collected by structured questionnaire using five point scales. The study population consist 2,133 academic staff of three (3) selected public universities from South-South, Nigeria. The unit of analysis was academic staff of the selected public universities and the Bowley’s proportional allocation formula was used to draw a sample size of 337 respondents. Two research hypotheses were formulated and tested at 0.05% level of significance. Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics (simple percentages, frequency counts, mean and standard deviation and Pearson correlation), diagnostic statistics (variance inflation factor) and inferential statistics (simple regression). Findings indicated that employee salary increase (f-value = 10.69; prob-value = 0.0001 0.05) insignificantly affects performance of public universities in Nigeria. In view of the findings, there is the need for government and universities authorities to formulate and implement policies that are employee-driven and recognizes the peculiarities of academic staff in terms of their physical and psychological needs; this includes amongst others, giving academic staff authority to seamlessly undertake core academic and administrative activities within public universities devoid of government interference. However, the study established that when employees are adequately rewarded, the goals and objectives of the institutions can be realized and hence performance will be increased.

Suggested Citation

  • OKWUISE, U. Young & UZOECHINA, Philomena Nkemdilim, 2023. "Reward Systems and Organizational Performance of Public Universities in South-South, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(10), pages 224-240, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:10:y:2023:i:10:p:224-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-10-issue-10/224-240.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/reward-systems-and-organizational-performance-of-public-universities-in-south-south-nigeria/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward P. Lazear, 2004. "Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 208-211, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Caliendo & Frank M. Fossen & Alexander Kritikos & Miriam Wetter, 2015. "The Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship: Not just a Matter of Personality," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 61(1), pages 202-238.
    2. Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik, 2010. "Entrepreneurship and its Determinants in a Cross-Country Setting," Springer Books, in: Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Culture, chapter 0, pages 157-170, Springer.
    3. Oasis Kodila-Tedika & Julius Agbor, 2016. "Does Trust Matter for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Cross-Section of Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Jisheng Yang & Di Ai, 2019. "Effect of the Big Five Personality Traits on Entrepreneurial Probability: Influence of China’s Household Registration System," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 487-503, December.
    5. Mark Doms & Ethan Lewis & Alicia Robb, 2010. "Local Labor Force Education, New Business Characteristics, and Firm Performance," NBER Chapters, in: Cities and Entrepreneurship, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Hårsman, Björn & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2019. "Reconsidering the returns to entrepreneurship: Applying a modified version of Lazear’s occupational choice model," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 478, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    7. Oliver Falck & Ludger Woessmann, 2013. "School competition and students’ entrepreneurial intentions: international evidence using historical Catholic roots of private schooling," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 459-478, February.
    8. Hemme, Florian & Morais, Dominic G. & Bowers, Matthew T. & Todd, Janice S., 2017. "Extending sport-based entrepreneurship theory through phenomenological inquiry," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 92-104.
    9. Nezameddin Faghih & Ebrahim Bonyadi & Lida Sarreshtehdari, 2021. "Assessing the entrepreneurship process: an application of the data envelopment analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 311-327, December.
    10. Xi, Guoqian & Block, Jörn & Lasch, Frank & Robert, Frank & Thurik, Roy, 2017. "How Does Firm Survival Differ between Business Takeovers and New Venture Start-ups?," IZA Discussion Papers 11155, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Junfu Zhang, 2011. "The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 187-208, February.
    12. Enrico Santarelli & Marco Vivarelli, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(3), pages 455-488, June.
    13. James Liang & Hui Wang & Edward P. Lazear, 2018. "Demographics and Entrepreneurship," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(S1), pages 140-196.
    14. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    15. Ross Levine & Yona Rubinstein, 2017. "Smart and Illicit: Who Becomes an Entrepreneur and Do They Earn More?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(2), pages 963-1018.
    16. Fabian Stephany & Ole Teutloff, 2022. "What is the Price of a Skill? The Value of Complementarity," Papers 2210.01535, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    17. Pilar Laguna-Sánchez & Pilar Abad & Concepción de la Fuente-Cabrero & Rocío Calero, 2020. "A University Training Programme for Acquiring Entrepreneurial and Transversal Employability Skills, a Students’ Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Natalia A. Shmatko & Valentina A. Permyakova, 2021. "The Contribution Of Entrepreneurial Skills To The Social Stratification Of Highly Qualified R&D Personnel: The Case Of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 122/STI/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Michael Fritsch & Alina Sorgner, 2013. "Stepping Forward: Personality Traits, Choice of Profession, and the Decision to Become Self-Employed," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 539, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    20. Hessels, Jolanda & Brixy, Udo & Naudé, Wim & Gries, Thomas, 2014. "Skill Variety, Innovation and New Business Formation," IZA Discussion Papers 7889, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:10:y:2023:i:10:p:224-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.