IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v6y2022i10p231-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmonized Gender and Development Guideline and Its Effect on Gender Responsive Infrastructure Projects of DPWH Region XI

Author

Listed:
  • Jezabel E. Tuling

    (Masters in Public Administration Major in Organization and Management Cor Jesu College, Digos, Davao del Sur, Philippines)

Abstract

This quantitative study to identify the effect of Harmonized Gender and Development Guidelines on DPWH Infrastructure Projects in Region XI, particularly the Daang Maharlika Road, covering the cities of Tagum and Panabo and the Municipality of Carmen. A stratified random sampling technique using Cochran (1977) was employed to determine the sampling size. In measuring the level of gender responsiveness Daang Maharlika Road, this study used the Harmonized Gender and Development Guidelines (HGDG) Box 10. GAD checklist for designing and evaluating infrastructure projects. Mean and Standard Deviation was utilized to analyze the data before and after the adoption of HGDG, while secondary data from the agency was used to describe how HGDG affects the prioritization of the DPWH Infrastructure Project in terms of gender and development responsiveness. The survey result showed that before the adoption of HGDG, the level of gender responsiveness of the infrastructure projects was moderate (ï x=1.86) (sd=0.43), which means that most of its road infrastructures and related facilities have promising GAD prospects but still need further technical assistance in some areas. While after the HGDG was adopted, the gender responsiveness of the infrastructure projects improved, as shown in the result that was described as high (ï x=2.50) (sd=0.25). By using the HGDG Tool, the department has guaranteed that the following factors are taken into account during the program/project identification stage: (a) the involvement of both men and women in problem identification; (b) the generation and use of sex-disaggregated data (SDD); and (c) gender analysis to identify gender issues. Lastly, the identified mechanisms to be developed to sustain a gender-responsive infrastructure project are the following: (a) involvement in the decision-making, (b) intensifying the implementation and monitoring, and (c) forging a partnership with other networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jezabel E. Tuling, 2022. "Harmonized Gender and Development Guideline and Its Effect on Gender Responsive Infrastructure Projects of DPWH Region XI," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 231-237, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:10:p:231-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-6-issue-10/231-237.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/harmonized-gender-and-development-guideline-and-its-effect-on-gender-responsive-infrastructure-projects-of-dpwh-region-xi/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steinbach, Rebecca & Green, Judith & Datta, Jessica & Edwards, Phil, 2011. "Cycling and the city: A case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1123-1130, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elias, Wafa & Katoshevski-Cavari, Rachel, 2014. "The role of socio-economic and environmental characteristics in school-commuting behavior: A comparative study of Jewish and Arab children in Israel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 79-87.
    2. Ravensbergen, Léa & Buliung, Ron & Sersli, Stephanie & Winters, Meghan, 2021. "Guest editorial: Critical Vélomobilities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Rybarczyk, Greg & Gallagher, Laura, 2014. "Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Aldred, Rachel & Woodcock, James, 2015. "Reframing safety: An analysis of perceptions of cycle safety clothing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 103-112.
    5. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Jonas Larsen, 2017. "The making of a pro-cycling city: Social practices and bicycle mobilities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 876-892, April.
    7. Tim Jones & Colin G Pooley & Griet Scheldeman & Dave Horton & Miles Tight & Caroline Mullen & Ann Jopson & Anthony Whiteing, 2012. "Moving around the City: Discourses on Walking and Cycling in English Urban Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1407-1424, June.
    8. Frater, Jillian & Kingham, Simon, 2020. "Adolescents and bicycling to school: Does behaviour setting/place make a difference?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Russell, Marie & Davies, Cheryl & Wild, Kirsty & Shaw, Caroline, 2021. "Pedalling towards equity: Exploring women's cycling in a New Zealand city," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Underwood, Sarah & Handy, Susan L., 2012. "Adolescent Attitudes Towards Active Transportation: Bicycling in Youth in Retrospect from Adulthood," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt993019hq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Julie Gamble, 2017. "Experimental Infrastructure: Experiences in Bicycling in Quito, Ecuador," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 162-180, January.
    12. Hamidi, Zahra, 2021. "Decomposing cycling potentials employing the motility framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. M. Reza Shirazi & Ramin Keivani & Sue Brownill & Georgia Butina Watson, 2022. "Promoting Social Sustainability of Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Bethnal Green, London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 441-465, May.
    14. Esther Fasan & Miles Tight & Harry Evdorides, 2021. "Factors Influencing Cycling among Secondary School Adolescents in an Ethnically Diverse City: The Perspective of Birmingham Transport Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Fitt, Helen, 2018. "Habitus and the loser cruiser: How low status deters bus use in a geographically limited field," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 228-233.
    16. Vidal Tortosa, Eugeni & Lovelace, Robin & Heinen, Eva & Mann, Richard P., 2021. "Cycling behaviour and socioeconomic disadvantage: An investigation based on the English National Travel Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 173-185.
    17. Liu, Qiyang & Liu, Zhengying & Kang, Tingting & Zhu, Le & Zhao, Pengjun, 2022. "Transport inequities through the lens of environmental racism: Rural-urban migrants under Covid-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 26-38.
    18. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    19. Osborne, Natalie & Grant-Smith, Deanna, 2017. "Constructing the cycling citizen: A critical analysis of policy imagery in Brisbane, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 44-53.
    20. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Van Criekingen, Mathieu & Bassens, David, 2019. "Moving past the sustainable perspectives on transport: An attempt to mobilise critical urban transport studies with the right to the city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 24-34.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:10:p:231-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.