IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220184546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Features And Distinctions Between High Technology And Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Serediuk

    (Non-Governmental Organization "Noosphere", Ukraine)

  • Yurii Vdovychenko

    (Cherkasy State Technological University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The goods, which are positioned on modern global markets as innovative and high-tech products, occupy more and more segments, owing to the contemporary modifications of the innovation diffusion theory and the ways of its implementation on high-tech markets. However, the meaning of the term "high technology" and "innovations" is quite disputable. An identification of the ontological characteristics of these definitions is of particular interest and practical value in terms of the transformation of a scientific and methodological framework for control of innovation diffusion in conditions of invariance on the market of high-tech information technology. Therefore, the author's article is aimed at the identification of the above-stated definitions and generalization of their distinctions. Methodology. The methodology of the article is based on the theoretical researches of Ukrainian and foreign scientists, which are synthesized, systematized, and analysed to identify the distinctive features of "high tech" and "innovations". One of the critical methodological tool, represented in the research, is an application of frequency analysis using online service "Google Books Ngram Viewer", which enabled us to compare frequency of references in scientific researches of the term "innovations" and "high technologies" as well as to compile analytical database of the research. Results. As a result of the author's study, it has been established that the frequency of using the term "innovations" is continuously increasing and the definition itself has a huge variety of interpretations. This paper suggests generalizing the innovations as the implementation of the new idea, which produces widespread and long-term changes. As distinct from innovations, a term "high technology" means the narrower spectrum of radical changes. Although it has a few names, such as "high-technology", "high tech", "high-tech", "hi-tech", which, besides technology, can have other functionality. Practical implications. The presented results make it possible to develop more efficient communication channels for innovation diffusion, more precisely to identify innovators and mechanisms of their involvement in corporate activities, alternative forms of innovative activities in corporations. Value/originality. As a result of the study, it has been proved that technologies have common features with radical technical innovations, such as high science intensity, enhanced efficiency. Nevertheless, while being distributed on the market, innovation becomes a commodity and high technologies remain the same until the creation of state-of-the-art technologies. On this basis, it is possible more precisely to introduce innovations of IT companies according to information technology market segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Serediuk & Yurii Vdovychenko, 2018. "Common Features And Distinctions Between High Technology And Innovation," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:5:46
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-315-319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-315-319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taalbi, Josef, 2017. "What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1437-1453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurel Burciu & Rozalia Kicsi & Simona Buta & Mihaela State & Iulia Burlac & Denisa Alexandra Chifan & Beatrice Ipsalat, 2023. "The Study of the Relationship among GCI, GII, Disruptive Technology, and Social Innovations in MNCs: How Do We Evaluate Financial Innovations Made by Firms? A Preliminary Inquiry," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-42, August.
    2. Yunpeng Sun & Ruoya Jia & Asif Razzaq & Qun Bao, 2023. "Drivers of China’s geographical renewable energy development: evidence from spatial association network structure approaches," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4115-4163, December.
    3. Baxter, David & Trott, Paul & Ellwood, Paul, 2023. "Reconceptualising innovation failure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    4. Ferdy F. F. Nuus & Petra C. M. Neessen & Cosmina L. Voinea & Marjolein C. J. Caniëls, 2022. "Sustainable Innovation in the Financial Sector during the Corona Crisis: How Discontinuity Affects Sustainable Innovation, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Yan, Hong-Bin & Li, Ming, 2022. "Consumer demand based recombinant search for idea generation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Khraisha, Tamer, 2020. "Complex economic problems and fitness landscapes: Assessment and methodological perspectives," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 390-407.
    7. Karen Núñez Valdés & Susana Quirós y Alpera & Luis Manuel Cerdá Suárez, 2021. "An Institutional Perspective for Evaluating Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Insights from the Chilean Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2021. "Back to the past: the historical roots of labor-saving automation," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 27-57, March.
    9. Wasniewski, Krzysztof, 2020. "Energy efficiency as manifestation of collective intelligence in human societies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Ichiro Watanabe & Soichiro Takagi, 2022. "NK model-based analysis of technological trajectories: a study on the technological field of computer graphic processing systems," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 119-140, April.
    11. Taalbi, Josef, 2020. "Evolution and structure of technological systems - An innovation output network," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    12. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan & Erzurumlu, Yaman O. & Yoon, YongKi, 2022. "National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Sugyeong Park & Sea Jin Kim & Hangnan Yu & Chul-Hee Lim & Eunbeen Park & Jiwon Kim & Woo-Kyun Lee, 2020. "Developing an Adaptive Pathway to Mitigate Air Pollution Risk for Vulnerable Groups in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Wang, Quan-Jing & Feng, Gen-Fu & Wang, Hai-Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2021. "The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Wang, Quan-Jing & Feng, Gen-Fu & Chen, Yin E. & Wen, Jun & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2019. "The impacts of government ideology on innovation: What are the main implications?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1232-1247.
    16. Drago? Tohãnean, , and & Alexandru Ilie Buzatu & Cristina-Andrada Baba & Bogdan Georgescu, 2020. "Business Model Innovation Through the Use of Digital Technologies: Managing Risks and Creating Sustainability," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 758-758, August.
    17. Espasandín-Bustelo, Francisco & Rufino-Rus, José Ignacio & Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Ángeles, 2023. "Innovation and performance in social economy enterprises: The mediating effect of legitimacy for customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Feng, Suling & Sui, Bo & Liu, Huimin & Li, Guoxiang, 2020. "Environmental decentralization and innovation in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 660-674.
    19. Beatriz Calzada Olvera, 2022. "Innovation in mining: what are the challenges and opportunities along the value chain for Latin American suppliers?," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 35-51, March.
    20. Tatiana Marceda Bach & Luciano Luiz Dalazen & Wesley Vieira da Silva & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2019. "Relationship Between Innovation and Performance in Private Companies: Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    global; markets; goods; modifications; theories; diffusion; innovations; high technologies; corporations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L00 - Industrial Organization - - General - - - General
    • N7 - Economic History - - Economic History: Transport, International and Domestic Trade, Energy, and Other Services
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • Y30 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Book Reviews - - - Book Reviews

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:5:46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.