IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/aoe000/y2024v2i3p260-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playful paragogy: Best practices for using memes for peer-led teaching and debriefing in an undergraduate curriculum

Author

Listed:
  • Eales, Owen

    (Pretoria, South Africa)

  • Lubbe, Irene (Jc)

    (Yehuda Elkana Center for Teaching, Austria)

Abstract

Internationally memes are increasingly being used in medical education to teach students. They are used as a tool to help students learn and remember complex medical concepts but are seldom used to help students debrief after difficult clinical experiences. Moreover, the medical curriculum tends to be delivered in a serious, content-heavy method that leaves little room for this type of creativity, fun and playfulness. Ludic pedagogy and paragogy offer an alternative approach to teaching and interaction and are based on fun, playfulness and student-led interaction within the boundaries of academic rigour. This best practice paper describes the alternative approach the authors used to create a playful, yet important opportunity for student debriefing during a highly stressful period. Method: fifth-year medical students were tasked with a non-graded assignment to create memes that reflect the content of the teaching and the rotation at the local medical clinics. There were no restrictions placed on the visual themes and students had the freedom to explore various sources for images and inspiration. After submission, a competition was launched, and students had the opportunity to discuss the memes and then vote for the best ones. A small cash prize was offered to the winner. Data analysis: after submission of the memes, a thematic analysis (based on the steps created by Creswell and Creswell1) was conducted to identify recurring topics and themes. Six themes were identified namely: view of faculty, online teaching in a pandemic, content taught, view of family medicine as a discipline, clinical interaction and mental health. These themes were then categorised into either content, context or process. Results and discussion: the students diverted from the original assignment where the instruction was to focus on content; however, the memes frequently alluded to aspects that mirrored the students’ current state of mind and their concerns. But it also reflected their humorous take on the content and context. The memes were indicative of the students’ need to air their views in a playful, yet safe environment and the need for frequent debriefing interventions in a serious curriculum and a stressful situation. This best practice paper/project provides evidence of not only the possibilities, but also the dire need to engage with students during turbulent times, in a different, yet rigorous way and to provide a safe environment for the much-needed emotional support and debriefing to support students in navigating challenging clinical situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Eales, Owen & Lubbe, Irene (Jc), 2024. "Playful paragogy: Best practices for using memes for peer-led teaching and debriefing in an undergraduate curriculum," Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 2(3), pages 260-270, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:aoe000:y:2024:v:2:i:3:p:260-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/8378/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/8378/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    constructivism; ludic pedagogy; meme; paragogy; student-centred(ness); entangled pedagogy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:aoe000:y:2024:v:2:i:3:p:260-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.