IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/aoe000/y2023v1i3p287-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physiology for all: Reflections on the design and delivery of a MOOC to enhance subject knowledge in physiology

Author

Listed:
  • Randles, Rebecca

    (Westminster Centre for Research in Veterans, UK)

  • Prescott, Denise

    (Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, UK)

  • Gleave, Terry

    (Room G57, UK)

  • Alston, Peter

    (BPP Education Group, UK)

  • Grubb, Blair

    (Tower Building, UK)

Abstract

Interactive digital technologies have begun to be an increasingly important tool within Higher Education (HE). One example of such technology is that of eLearning, particularly with the growing interest in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Prospective students would have the benefit of utilising MOOCs to explore potential pathways and subject areas, with physiology chosen to be developed into a MOOC to raise the profile with a view to improving recruitment into physiology or physiology-related study pathways. The course was created in 2017 and to date, 17,986 individuals have enrolled onto the course with an average rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars. Upon reflection, the MOOC reached some of the target audience; however, the majority appeared to be those who were in employment and were utilising the resource to enhance their learning. Lessons learnt from the development and implementation of the MOOC include the importance of collaboration and partnerships, particularly with the target audience, to ensure the course is fit for purpose. In addition, the planning of the MOOC itself was found to be of great importance; the team discovered the importance of utilising storyboards to develop the scripts and interaction opportunities as well as ensuring the inclusion of demonstrations and animations to help learners visualise key concepts and essential information. While the initial ambition for the Physiology MOOC was targeted at a younger demographic, in preparation for their journey into further or higher education, and potentially a career in the discipline, the data indicates limited impact in this regard. A potential reason for this could be the platforms on which the MOOC was promoted: the target audience may be better reached through promotion in schools and colleges; there may also be a lack of awareness of the platform within this population. Although it is questionable as to whether a MOOC is the most appropriate vehicle for this purpose, the evidence suggests that a large number of learners across the demographic spectrum benefitted greatly from the learning materials and evaluated them highly.

Suggested Citation

  • Randles, Rebecca & Prescott, Denise & Gleave, Terry & Alston, Peter & Grubb, Blair, 2023. "Physiology for all: Reflections on the design and delivery of a MOOC to enhance subject knowledge in physiology," Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 1(3), pages 287-295, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:aoe000:y:2023:v:1:i:3:p:287-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/7707/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/7707/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MOOC; online learning; virtual learning; higher education; eLearning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:aoe000:y:2023:v:1:i:3:p:287-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.