IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/awf/journl/y2021i3-4p47-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Graphic Design in Communicating Scientific Discoveries

Author

Listed:
  • Ana-Sanda Vieru

Abstract

Science and design have a special connection build up through centuries. The present paper highlights the most relevant examples confirming the hypothesis of design-science collaboration and looks at identifying the role of design in this collaboration. Design, and especially graphic design, is a science in itself. Its principles, its process, strategies, methodologies and techniques can be an unlimited source of improvement to scientific progress. Today, design is both, a tool for a wider understanding of sciences and a contributor to scientific achievements, through its aspects of innovation, usercenteredness, functionality focused aesthetics, problem-solving and contextual awareness

Suggested Citation

  • Ana-Sanda Vieru, 2021. "The Role of Graphic Design in Communicating Scientific Discoveries," Intellectus, State Agency on Intellectual Property (AGEPI), issue 3-4, pages 47-59, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:awf:journl:y:2021:i:3-4:p:47-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://agepi.gov.md/sites/default/files/intellectus/Intellectus_3-4_2021_47.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brooks, Harvey, 1994. "The relationship between science and technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 477-486, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wong, Chan-Yuan & Wang, Lili, 2015. "Trajectories of science and technology and their co-evolution in BRICS: Insights from publication and patent analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 90-101.
    2. Lionel Nesta & Vincent Mangematin, 2002. "Industry Life Cycle, Knowledge Generation and Technological Networks," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03398092, HAL.
    3. Gersbach, Hans & Sorger, Gerhard & Amon, Christian, 2018. "Hierarchical growth: Basic and applied research," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 434-459.
    4. Tsao, J.Y. & Boyack, K.W. & Coltrin, M.E. & Turnley, J.G. & Gauster, W.B., 2008. "Galileo's stream: A framework for understanding knowledge production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 330-352, March.
    5. Wang, Jean J. & Ye, Fred Y., 2021. "Probing into the interactions between papers and patents of new CRISPR/CAS9 technology: A citation comparison," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    6. Becker Wolfgang & Peters Jürgen, 2005. "Innovation Effects of Science-Related Technological Opportunities / Innovationseffekte von technologischen Möglichkeiten aus dem Wissenschaftsbereich: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 225(2), pages 130-150, April.
    7. Denzil PILLAY & Brian BARNARD, 2019. "Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Management: Knowledge Requirements, Utility, Creation, and Competency," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 7(1), pages 44-81.
    8. Elizabeth S. Vieira & Jorge Cerdeira, 2022. "The integration of African countries in international research networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1995-2021, April.
    9. Benjamin Clark, 2011. "Influences and conflicts of federal policies in academic–industrial scientific collaboration," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 514-545, October.
    10. Christophe Krzeminski, 2019. "Creative minds: Hyperconnected or Disconnected ? [Créativité: hyperconnectée ou déconnectée ?]," Working Papers hal-02349025, HAL.
    11. Mikko Mustonen, 2010. "The employment contract when the firm can utilize a free resource," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 239-250, April.
    12. Lavoie, Marie & Roy, Richard & Therrien, Pierre, 2003. "A growing trend toward knowledge work in Canada," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 827-844, May.
    13. Xiaozan Lyu & Ping Zhou & Loet Leydesdorff, 2020. "Eco-system mapping of techno-science linkages at the level of scholarly journals and fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2037-2055, September.
    14. Gezahegn Tesfaye & Daniel Kitaw, 2018. "An Innovation Capability Development Process for Firms in Developing Countries: A Theoretical Conceptual Model," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(3), pages 87-110.
    15. Liu Li & Chaoying Tang, 2020. "How Does Inter-Organizational Cooperation Impact Organizations’ Scientific Knowledge Generation? Evidence from the Biomass Energy Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Carayol, Nicolas, 2003. "Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 887-908, June.
    17. Pezzoni, Michele & Veugelers, Reinhilde & Visentin, Fabiana, 2022. "How fast is this novel technology going to be a hit? Antecedents predicting follow-on inventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    18. Alhusen, Harm & Bennat, Tatjana & Bizer, Kilian & Cantner, Uwe & Horstmann, Elaine & Kalthaus, Martin & Proeger, Till & Sternberg, Rolf & Töpfer, Stefan, 2021. "A New Measurement Conception for the ‘Doing-Using-Interacting’ Mode of Innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    19. Ana-Sanda Vieru, 2022. "The Role of Graphic Design in Communicating Scientific Discoveries," Intellectus, State Agency on Intellectual Property (AGEPI), issue 3-4, pages 47-59, january.
    20. Ina Ganguli, 2017. "Saving Soviet Science: The Impact of Grants When Government R&D Funding Disappears," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 165-201, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:awf:journl:y:2021:i:3-4:p:47-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AGEPI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://agepi.gov.md/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.