IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v20y2018i47p30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of ISO 22000 in Romanian Companies: Motivations, Difficulties and Key Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Paunescu

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Ruxandra Argatu

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Miruna Lungu

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The development of well-designed food safety management systems that take into consideration the potential risks and threats to an organization and their associated impacts to business operations should be a key goal for each organization operating in the food supply chain. This study provides quantitative empirical evidence about the motivations for implementing a food safety management system based on ISO 22000. By employing factor analysis and multiple linear regression, it analyses the benefits that the ISO 22000 certified companies gained through certification, as well as the main constraints that may prevent the adoption of the standard in the food industry. The survey is based on a sample of Romanian companies distributed at all levels of the food chain, but mainly at the production level. While there exist external pressures that lead companies to adopt a food safety management system based on ISO 22000, the motivations that are most relevant in this decision are generally internal in nature. The results of our study identify three major benefits of ISO 22000 certification: food safety improvement and provision of safer products, reduction of illness and other risks arising from food and improvement of consumers’ confidence. Also, it points out three constraints limiting the dissemination and use of ISO 22000: employees’ qualification, costs associated with food safety management system implementation and legal requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Paunescu & Ruxandra Argatu & Miruna Lungu, 2018. "Implementation of ISO 22000 in Romanian Companies: Motivations, Difficulties and Key Benefits," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 20(47), pages 1-30, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:47:p:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_2693.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lijiao Hu & Yuqing Zheng & Timothy A. Woods & Yoko Kusunose & Steven Buck, 2023. "The market for private food safety certifications: Conceptual framework, review, and future research directions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 197-220, March.
    2. Lungu Miruna Florina, 2020. "Factors determining company performance in the IT industry," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 59-77, March.
    3. Xiaoli Zhao & Pavel Castka & Cory Searcy, 2020. "ISO Standards: A Platform for Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Dominik Zimon & Peter Madzik & Pedro Domingues, 2020. "Development of Key Processes along the Supply Chain by Implementing the ISO 22000 Standard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Nathalia Granja & Pedro Domingues & Mónica Cabecinhas & Dominik Zimon & Paulo Sampaio, 2021. "ISO 22000 Certification: Diffusion in Europe," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Lungu Miruna Florina, 2020. "The influence of strategic agility on firm performance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 102-110, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food safety management system; ISO 22000; Romanian companies; food industry; factor analysis; multiple regression.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:47:p:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.