IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arh/jrujec/v6y2020i2p177-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delineating market boundaries in the Russian mass notification market: An application of critical loss analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yannis Katsoulacos

    (ESSEC Business School, Paris, France
    Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece)

  • Natalia S. Pavlova

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
    Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey E. Shastitko

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
    Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Telecom companies are a frequent target of antitrust investigations in Russia. In an industry where services tend to become more and more complex and companies actively invest in diversifying their businesses, the antitrust authority in most of its telecom cases has chosen to define markets narrowly, which increases antitrust risks for the companies. This paper uses poll data on mass SMS notifications — a market in recently investigated by the FAS Russia — to demonstrate, using critical loss analysis, that the market should be defined in broader terms. In particular, the main empirical finding is that the relevant product market boundaries should cover not only SMS, but also email, messengers and push and voice notifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannis Katsoulacos & Natalia S. Pavlova & Andrey E. Shastitko, 2020. "Delineating market boundaries in the Russian mass notification market: An application of critical loss analysis," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 6(2), pages 177-195, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:arh:jrujec:v:6:y:2020:i:2:p:177-195
    DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.6.50122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rujec.org/article/50122/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/j.ruje.6.50122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrey Shastitko, 2011. "Collective Dominance Through the Lens of Comparative Antitrust," Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy International, vol. 8.
    2. Øystein Daljord & Lars Sørgard & Øyvind Thomassen, 2014. "Asymmetric Price Increase In Critical Loss Analysis: A Reply To Langenfeld And Li," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 765-768.
    3. Shastitko, Andrey (Шаститко, Андрей) & Kurdin, Alexander (Курдин, Александр) & Markova, Olga (Маркова, Ольга) & Мeleshkina, Аnna (Мелешкина, Анна) & Morosanova, Anastasia (Моросанова, Анастасия) & Pav, 2019. "Competition and competition policy: at the junction of the future and past [Конкуренция И Конкурентная Политика: На Стыке Будущего И Прошлого]," Published Papers 021908, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yusupova, Guzel (Юсупова, Гюзель) & Kiseleva, Olga (Киселева, Ольга), 2015. "Was there a collusion? (Once again on the monopolistically high prices of Russian oil companies) [Был Ли Молчаливый Сговор? Еще Раз О Монопольно Высоких Ценах Российских Нефтяных Компаний]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 178-195.
    2. Baltzopoulos, Apostolos & Kim, Jaewon & Mandorff, Martin, 2015. "UPP Analysis in Five Recent Merger Cases," Konkurrensverket Working Paper Series in Law and Economics 2015:3, Konkurrensverket (Swedish Competition Authority).
    3. Avdasheva, Svetlana & Goreyko, Nadezhda & Pittman, Russell, 2011. "Abuse of collective dominance under the competition law of the Russian Federation," MPRA Paper 33742, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    critical loss analysis market definition SMS-notifications SSNIP test telecommunications.;

    JEL classification:

    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arh:jrujec:v:6:y:2020:i:2:p:177-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teodor Georgiev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rujec.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.