IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1993834561-567_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Activating communities for health promotion: A process evaluation method

Author

Listed:
  • Wickizer, T.M.
  • Von Korff, M.
  • Cheadle, A.
  • Maeser, J.
  • Wagner, E.H.
  • Pearson, D.
  • Beery, W.
  • Psaty, B.M.

Abstract

Objectives. To date, evaluations of community-based prevention programs have focused on assessing outcomes, not the process of organizing communities for health promotion. An approach was developed to analyze community organization efforts aimed at advancing community health objectives. These organizational processes are referred to as community activation. Methods. Information was gathered from 762 informants through a key informant survey conducted in 28 western communities. The data collected included informant ratings of community activation and information about interorganizational activities analyzed through network analytic techniques. Results. Activation levels, as measured by informant ratings, varied across communities. Program coordination, as measured by network analysis, occurred, on average, approximately 30% of the time. Higher income communities tended to be more activated than lower income communities. Conclusions. There is a widely recognized need for improved information about health-related community organization activities. It appears possible to gather such information through key informant surveys and to develop measures of community organization status that can be used in the evaluation of community health promotion programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wickizer, T.M. & Von Korff, M. & Cheadle, A. & Maeser, J. & Wagner, E.H. & Pearson, D. & Beery, W. & Psaty, B.M., 1993. "Activating communities for health promotion: A process evaluation method," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(4), pages 561-567.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:4:561-567_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viadro, Claire I. & Earp, Jo Anne L. & Altpeter, Mary, 1997. "Designing a process evaluation for a comprehensive breast cancer screening intervention: Challenges and opportunities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 237-249, August.
    2. Heflinger, Craig Anne, 1996. "Measuring service system coordination in managed mental health care for children and youth," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 155-163, May.
    3. Allen Cheadle & Edward Wagner & Carolyn Anderman & Mary Walls & Colleen McBride & Michelle A. Bell & Richard F. Catalano & Eric Pettigrew, 1998. "Measuring Community Mobilization in the Seattle Minority Youth Health Project," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(6), pages 699-716, December.
    4. Nilsen, Oystein, 1996. "Community health promotion: concepts and lessons from contemporary sociology," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 167-183, May.
    5. Hawe, Penelope & Noort, Michelle & King, Lesley & Jordens, Christopher, 1997. "Multiplying Health Gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 29-42, January.
    6. Friedman, Stacey R. & Reynolds, Jesse & Quan, Michael A. & Call, Stephanie & Crusto, Cindy A. & Kaufman, Joy S., 2007. "Measuring changes in interagency collaboration: An examination of the Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 294-306, August.
    7. Valente, Thomas W. & Coronges, Kathryn A. & Stevens, Gregory D. & Cousineau, Michael R., 2008. "Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: A network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 392-402, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:4:561-567_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.