IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2013.301750_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Ferdinand, A.O.
  • Menachemi, N.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature examining the relationship between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks. We extracted data from abstracts of 206 empirical articles published between 1968 and 2012 and developed a logistic regression model to identify correlates of a detrimental relationship between secondary tasks and driving performance. Of 350 analyses, 80% reported finding a detrimental relationship. Studies using experimental designs were 37%less likely toreport a detrimental relationship (P = .014). Studies examining mobile phone use while drivingwere 16%more likely to find such a relationship (P = .009). Quasi-experiments can better determine the effects of secondary tasks on driving performance and consequently serve to inform policymakers interested in reducing distracted driving and increasing roadway safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferdinand, A.O. & Menachemi, N., 2014. "Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(3), pages 39-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301750_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. French, Michael T. & Gumus, Gulcin, 2018. "Watch for motorcycles! The effects of texting and handheld bans on motorcyclist fatalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 81-87.
    2. Burbano, Vanessa C. & Ostler, James, 2021. "Differences in consumer-benefiting misconduct by nonprofit, for-profit, and public organizations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 117-136.
    3. Brown, Nerissa C. & Elliott, W. Brooke & Wermers, Russ & White, Roger M., 2021. "News or noise: Mobile internet technology and stock market activity," CFR Working Papers 21-10, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301750_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.