IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ann/journl/v18y2015i1p49-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aspekty etyczne systemow oceniania pracownikow w instytucjach publicznych/ Ethical Aspects of the Appraisal Systems in Public Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Walenia

    (University of Rzeszow)

Abstract

A performance appraisal system forms an integral part of any developed management concept. The efficiency of such an appraisal system is fostered in institutions which prioritise quality and continuous improvement, and where innovationfriendly actions are joined by those that build confidence. An efficient appraisal system is characterised as follows: it is systemic in character, regular, universal, flexible, concrete, transparent and simple in application. When implementing a modern appraisal system, care should be taken to adhere to ethically sound principles such as fairness, objectivity, goodness and truthfulness.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Walenia, 2015. "Aspekty etyczne systemow oceniania pracownikow w instytucjach publicznych/ Ethical Aspects of the Appraisal Systems in Public Institutions," Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, vol. 18(1), pages 49-59, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ann:journl:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:49-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.annalesonline.uni.lodz.pl/archiwum/2015/2015_1_walenia_49_59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    appraisal system; personnel management;

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ann:journl:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:49-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/welodpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.